Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 16:23:28 -0400 From: Nick Rogers <ncrogers@gmail.com> To: Garrett Cooper <yanefbsd@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD STABLE <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> Subject: Re: arp -na performance w/ many permanent entries Message-ID: <AANLkTilTBOf4jmMqajyjgdmdTRFiphIJExEjm-3T3oUG@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikHCs2x2qiinD9LRnbV0YhXsBKrUFuT_utstzUu@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTilKiJDLqqwgdKIAUJY-O7jXb4A4FGyPlZZSnjyj@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimQFH5biSlhy0Bm1Cc61DF5lutMacAn_ONiSB2W@mail.gmail.com> <20100606031627.GA4742@icarus.home.lan> <AANLkTikHCs2x2qiinD9LRnbV0YhXsBKrUFuT_utstzUu@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Garrett Cooper <yanefbsd@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I agree with Jeremy. I think that the problem that you've > discovered is the fact that it's using stdio-based buffered output > instead of buffering more of the contents in a string and punting it > out in larger chunks. > HTH, > -Garrett > I don't think so. The performance difference when taking out the interface lookup is huge even though the data output to STDOUT is mostly the same. I'll try the other lists, thanks.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTilTBOf4jmMqajyjgdmdTRFiphIJExEjm-3T3oUG>