Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 12:52:52 +0100 From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> To: Rob Farmer <rfarmer@predatorlabs.net> Cc: Ed Flecko <edflecko@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Should I use the standard-supfile or stable-supfile? Message-ID: <20110121125252.7c34abdc.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikeWyCd-e2UquhSFOtqnG4KJkucoSTm1vF_emMB@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTimmRcO2HLaZQ1SX9kmeByi-6VhiqdZHmJvhhvmD@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimVtswTX1CijDKoBzGOpjS8QMvVdhYjGAPJJafU@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTiknV1P4bhgtmxW6FG%2BXysX76qV0ZgkdAzKJNQ8u@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikeWyCd-e2UquhSFOtqnG4KJkucoSTm1vF_emMB@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:09:49 -0800, Rob Farmer <rfarmer@predatorlabs.net> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 15:42, Ed Flecko <edflecko@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thank you Nerius! > > > > Would it be smart to run this daily via cron? > > No, the errata branches are only updated once every couple months (on > average) - that's overkill. As an addition: It may be an option to switch to binary updates (using the freebsd-update program) if you want to track -RELEASE for GENERIC kernel anyway. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110121125252.7c34abdc.freebsd>