Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 20:21:33 +0200 From: Marco van Lienen <marco+freebsd-current@lordsith.net> To: Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] ZFS version 15 committed to head Message-ID: <20100717182133.GA63078@lordsith.net> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikusWLS-3lZpY62cw2XxTdAQTG5KtFfrU29hG_W@mail.gmail.com> References: <4C3C7202.7090103@FreeBSD.org> <20100717101459.GA13626@lordsith.net> <9E4FCF4C-7A69-426E-9F39-B5487D4CB07C@lassitu.de> <20100717105134.GB13626@lordsith.net> <AANLkTikusWLS-3lZpY62cw2XxTdAQTG5KtFfrU29hG_W@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 10:12:10AM -0700, you (Freddie Cash) sent the following to the -current list: > > > > I have read many things about those differences, but why then does zfs on opensolaris report more available space whereas FreeBSD does not? > > That would imply that my friend running osol build 117 couldn't fill up his raidz pool past the 3.56T. > > You used different commands to check the disk space on OSol (zpool vs df). > > Try the same commands on both FreeBSD and OSol (zpool and zfs) and > you'll see the same results. I guess you missed my original mail of this thread in which I also showed the output of 'zfs list -r pool2' on osol where clearly there is more available space shown then on FreeBSD. % zfs list -r pool2 NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT pool2 3.32T 2.06T 3.18T /export/pool2 > > df works differently on OSol than it does on FreeBSD, you can't compare them. HTH
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100717182133.GA63078>