Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 20:12:08 +0900 (JST) From: TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro <nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org> To: pluknet@gmail.com Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98 Message-ID: <20100526.201208.27863135.nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTil9k6sbVTLpu_-Hk_q3HxQybSkeuX5JuoFBz4Dv@mail.gmail.com> References: <201005251513.o4PFD490071374@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <AANLkTil9k6sbVTLpu_-Hk_q3HxQybSkeuX5JuoFBz4Dv@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <AANLkTil9k6sbVTLpu_-Hk_q3HxQybSkeuX5JuoFBz4Dv@mail.gmail.com> pluknet <pluknet@gmail.com> writes: > Just wonder why apic is still commented out in pc98's GENERIC. > Is there a reason to keep things intact? > It was inherited from i386 port in time when it was commented out. Because, most of pc98 does not have APIC. In addition, SMP support on pc98 is broken. --- TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro <nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100526.201208.27863135.nyan>