Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 22 Feb 2011 08:46:05 -0800
From:      Garrett Cooper <gcooper@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Andrew Duane <aduane@juniper.net>
Cc:        Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: seeking into /dev/{null,zero}
Message-ID:  <AANLkTimwOVub6XxZqgCmHPnLbekJrEbYQBzxUr%2BUrcR5@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AC6674AB7BC78549BB231821ABF7A9AE970EA06474@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
References:  <20110222141112.GA98964@freebsd.org> <AANLkTi=TCXhy9pvzKPsqtmX89JyB4CDnEuP2-jeF60_N@mail.gmail.com> <AC6674AB7BC78549BB231821ABF7A9AE970EA06474@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
(Please bottom post)

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Andrew Duane <aduane@juniper.net> wrote:
> I thought seeking past EOF was valid; writing something creates a file with a hole in it. I always assumed that was standard semantics.

    That's with SET_HOLE/SET_DATA though, correct? If so, outside of
that functionality I would assume relatively standard POSIX semantics.
Thanks,
-Garrett



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTimwOVub6XxZqgCmHPnLbekJrEbYQBzxUr%2BUrcR5>