Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:36:25 -0800 From: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> To: =?utf-8?Q?Radek_Krej=C4=8Da?= <radek.krejca@starnet.cz> Cc: "questions@freebsd.org" <questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ntpd crashes during start - a lot of interfaces Message-ID: <F7EA7068-3851-4321-96F1-C55EDAE2FEB0@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <B2E0472020754D45B72E9B0CE35278CA90C4D186C4@EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz> References: <B2E0472020754D45B72E9B0CE35278CA90C4D186C4@EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Feb 5, 2012, at 10:39 PM, Radek Krej=E8a wrote: > I have problem with using ntpd on 8.2 amd64 (not tested elsewhere). If = I have a lot of interfaces (vlans) ntpd crashes with segmentation fault = (core dump). I have tested on my test machine and it really depends on = number of interfaces. It try to bind on every of it. >=20 > I want to reduce it with using some options (like -I em0) but it seems = that ntpd ignore it. If I use truss the system calls look same. >=20 > Is there any way to bind directly on specified interface? -I is supposed to do that, but if it doesn't work right, consider = gaining a bit more debugging info (a backtrace from running under gdb or = against the corefile) and filing a PR. You could also discuss this with = "upstream", meaning the NTP mailing list at = <questions@lists.ntp.org>.... Regards, --=20 -Chuck
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F7EA7068-3851-4321-96F1-C55EDAE2FEB0>