Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 19:09:15 -0800 From: aurfalien <aurfalien@gmail.com> To: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@turbofuzz.com> Cc: "freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Controller for ZFS Message-ID: <935848BA-63FE-4DC7-908C-14A6230A0270@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <B3E1A648-00C1-46F7-88D2-09B5034B49AC@turbofuzz.com> References: <CEA907F4.12261%shawn.wallbridge@imaginaryforces.com> <31CBC0E1-5D63-43E9-981A-72F4B66BF43A@gmail.com> <B3E1A648-00C1-46F7-88D2-09B5034B49AC@turbofuzz.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 13, 2013, at 7:06 PM, Jordan Hubbard wrote: >=20 > On Nov 13, 2013, at 11:02 AM, aurfalien <aurfalien@gmail.com> wrote: >=20 >> In terms of HBAs, I would go LSI. >=20 > There=92s some other choice? :-) >=20 > - Jordan Well my fine feathered friend, there is always a choice. The question is wether its a good choice or a not so good choice. Which leads me to my next question; To be or not to be...? ... And the answer is... Pfffffffffffffffffttttttt..... - aurf
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?935848BA-63FE-4DC7-908C-14A6230A0270>