Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 10:32:05 +0100 From: Franco Fichtner <franco@lastsummer.de> To: NGie Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>, David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org>, FreeBSD CURRENT <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Segmentation fault running ntpd Message-ID: <5C3532DB-CFD2-4C30-8854-9C9E883D5148@lastsummer.de> In-Reply-To: <B5598D1A-04D2-4488-8885-5D9A2D2D92ED@gmail.com> References: <20150718120956.GC1155@albert.catwhisker.org> <86pozwbvds.fsf@desk.des.no> <FDD0A8E1-C812-4C65-8047-CC48106128F1@gmail.com> <86lhakbua7.fsf@desk.des.no> <F24CF26E-85AE-4FC0-A8B9-6BB929B805ED@gmail.com> <9D306406-691B-491E-8933-D991A09620A3@lastsummer.de> <B5598D1A-04D2-4488-8885-5D9A2D2D92ED@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well, it=E2=80=99s on stable/10 since September 16 and somebody reported = that this particular branch would not trigger the crash along with HEAD, but any 10.x would. Can=E2=80=99t find the reference right now though. > On 30 Oct 2015, at 10:24 am, NGie Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> = wrote: >=20 >=20 >> On Oct 30, 2015, at 02:18, Franco Fichtner <franco@lastsummer.de> = wrote: >>=20 >> Hi all, >>=20 >> I did a quick test build and this seems to solve the ntpd crash issue >> on top of releng/10.1. >=20 > Makes sense =E2=80=A6 looking through my email r287591 was never MFCed = back to stable/9 or stable/10 :/ . > HTH, > -NGie > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5C3532DB-CFD2-4C30-8854-9C9E883D5148>