Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:05:12 +0100 From: "Paul B. Mahol" <onemda@gmail.com> To: "Yuriy Tsibizov" <Yuriy.Tsibizov@gfk.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, kmacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: _rw_wlock_hard: recursing but non-recursive rw radix node head @ /usr/src/sys/net/route.c:831 Message-ID: <3a142e750901140905j7fe74944wcf96969a79ccc017@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <BA0C4C2EEBEBFD448415F22CE73EEC0C13C5D2@ex-be-1.hhp.local> References: <BA0C4C2EEBEBFD448415F22CE73EEC0C13C5BD@ex-be-1.hhp.local> <3a142e750901140435m58c067c5t5cb100518f882f23@mail.gmail.com> <BA0C4C2EEBEBFD448415F22CE73EEC0C13C5D2@ex-be-1.hhp.local>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1/14/09, Yuriy Tsibizov <Yuriy.Tsibizov@gfk.com> wrote: > >> On 1/14/09, Yuriy Tsibizov <Yuriy.Tsibizov@gfk.com> wrote: >> > Kip, >> > >> > this happens on fresh -CURRENT, with configuration similar to one >> > described in >> > >> http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3a142e750812080658r645dc1c >> 4sdd612585 >> > fe9ad7d6 (wpa_supplicant is main suspect in triggering this >> panic). No >> > crashdump / backtrace available. >> > >> > Somehow needlock!=0, and rnh is already locked. >> > >> > HW is Intel Atom D945GCLF2 (2core + HT enabled) + D-Link >> Atheros-based >> > card with WPA and static ip. > >> And bt is completly the same as was mine? > > I don't have backtrace -- swap was tooo small. How you reproduced it? Textdumps are very small compared to vmcores. You are probably using custom kernel. -- Paul
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3a142e750901140905j7fe74944wcf96969a79ccc017>