Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 9 Oct 2013 16:32:00 +0200
From:      Piotr Kucharski <piotr.kucharski@42.pl>
To:        Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: very slow zfs scrub
Message-ID:  <CAOuVJitSafkBUA_bZhHFfZWGbQCXoa-7F-6esAb70zyELEpaBw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=4OZr8WnRPdkn4=yULnZR%2BtjBFgA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <AANLkTim6z5KiceXQE-DHt51TBs%2BSO8NNLpi7fYBTwXpE@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimDqcdNv0DqyScEQU3Fw=t9xtOaAZqy2BfWNhpw@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTik%2BUhMSfGgNPr=qd_Rfwb-12aXHWGAJnNGQH2j=@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikjKwee9o2RGa1NLFHodV6kEVkSfSsNEw_25yMZ@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=4OZr8WnRPdkn4=yULnZR%2BtjBFgA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I was checking on it infrequently and now, almost 3 years later, it seems
to have been fixed. :)

Scrub in progress for 50h, 6.86T scanned out of 11.6T at 40M/s, 34h43m to
go, 0 repaired, 59.18% done.

Each 0.01T varies in speed, from 5M/s (fortunately, very rare) to 85M/s,
but average of 40M/s is good enough to let it finish (for the first time in
this filesystem history! :>)

I did not change hardware nor ggate setup, "only" FreeBSD got upgraded, now
it is FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #75 r251912 with no patches.

Just informing so it does not scare people if they stumble upon this
thread. :)


On 19 May 2011 18:29, Piotr Kucharski <piotr.kucharski@42.pl> wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 21:00, Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Wow! What does scrub do that it slows ggate drive almost to halt?
> >>
> >> What can I do to fix it?
> >
> > I think network latency is going to have huge impact on performance here.
> > Have you tried any ggate or nic tuning?  Would HAST be an option for
> you?  I
> > think it has more performance thought put into it.
> >
>
> Well, the network seems rather idle, host and client share the same
> 1Gb LAN (not sure if the same switch, though) with <0.2ms rtt for 1k
> packets in ping. When not scrubbing, sequential reads are
> satisfactory. I'm inclined to think some read or write pattern of
> scrub that is causing ggate to suck immensely. :/
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOuVJitSafkBUA_bZhHFfZWGbQCXoa-7F-6esAb70zyELEpaBw>