Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 16 May 2011 22:22:23 +0300
From:      Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>
Cc:        ports@FreeBSD.org, Diane Bruce <db@db.net>
Subject:   Re: patch for force fetch
Message-ID:  <4DD1796F.2000305@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=MKn09fG6SQ2MPdRGNi6rJ=t8biA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <4DD0CC21.5050305@FreeBSD.org> <20110516120807.GA34582@night.db.net> <BANLkTi=MKn09fG6SQ2MPdRGNi6rJ=t8biA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 16/05/2011 19:53 Eitan Adler said the following:
>> I've run into this myself and simply done the manual rm -f. This looks like
>> a great addition.
> 
> what about make distclean  ?

Can you please elaborate?
If you mean that I could just run 'make distclean', then my answer is why should
I.  I.e. if the ports infrastructure already knows that there is something wrong
with a local copy of a distfile (wrong size, wrong checksum), then it should
just do the right thing and not annoy me to run some cleanup action.

-- 
Andriy Gapon



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4DD1796F.2000305>