Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 13:32:18 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: utisoft@gmail.com Cc: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>, ohauer@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: proper use of bsd.port.options.mk Message-ID: <4DD189D2.3060106@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimqJVnb8BnJKaDNWBZw=OvZpk1hnw@mail.gmail.com> References: <4DD09B45.9070306@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1105152216460.20421@wonkity.com> <BANLkTin08WiMbkzpKmq_zaz2cGp0esMJxg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1105160754150.22315@wonkity.com> <BANLkTi=ZV75sVcW_wf9mvjad2EV6TVrZmg@mail.gmail.com> <4DD17E78.20003@FreeBSD.org> <BANLkTimqJVnb8BnJKaDNWBZw=OvZpk1hnw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05/16/2011 13:17, Chris Rees wrote: > You can't define USE_JAVA_after_ bsd.port.pre.mk and expect JAVA_PORT > to be defined... What I'm looking for is an actual example of something that doesn't work for the common case. Where "actual" includes a path to a port that I can test. And I'm not trying to be a pita here, I have two goals; one is to update my ports to use bsd.port.options.mk, and the other is to get the documentation updated. I don't want to do either until we are all sure that we know the facts accurately. Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4DD189D2.3060106>