Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 20:41:20 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Quentin SCHWERKOLT <develloper.unix@hotmail.fr> Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: UFS1 vs UFS2 Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1212302040590.4966@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <BAY002-W211AF4BA0884C546AE231E6843D0@phx.gbl> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1212301420030.3192@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <BAY002-W211AF4BA0884C546AE231E6843D0@phx.gbl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
i chose with newfs as i don't use installer :) anyway - it is not an answer to the question. On Sun, 30 Dec 2012, Quentin SCHWERKOLT wrote: > Since FreeBSD 9.0, you can choose between UFS1 and UFS2 in bsdinstall(8) when creating a new freebsd-ufs partition. > > Q. Schwerkolt > >> Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 14:21:26 +0100 >> From: wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl >> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org >> Subject: UFS1 vs UFS2 >> >> OpenBSD by default use UFS1 for partitions smaller than 1TB. >> >> FreeBSD use always UFS2. UFS2 uses double the amount of space for inodes. >> basic operation seems the same. >> >> Does it make sense to use UFS1 for small filesystem (on SSD) that would >> have few millions of files. It will take less space for inodes, but how >> about performance? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1212302040590.4966>