Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 15:14:56 +0100 From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Version of "opencv-core-2.3.1" Message-ID: <CADLo83-A-4riwwBqXz05adXopgD%2BnY=2bXX17xyf__hWT%2BjbhQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <BLU0-SMTP176E9578B891A9292981B7493080@phx.gbl> References: <BLU0-SMTP124381DBDEC52F570FEF1CA93080@phx.gbl> <4E75DE55.7080206@infracaninophile.co.uk> <BLU0-SMTP176E9578B891A9292981B7493080@phx.gbl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 18 Sep 2011 15:02, "Carmel" <carmel_ny@hotmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:04:37 +0100 > Matthew Seaman articulated: > > > If you wait for a few hours and re-csup it should be fixed. AFAIK, I > > don't think this affects portsnap because it generates the INDEX in a > > different way. Or you can create your own INDEX if you want. > > Thanks Mathew for you info. I am using "portsnap" so apparently it does > exhibit this behavior. I any case, since it is apparently not a critical > problem I will just ignore it for now. > > Since Matthew pointed out that the versions were actually going forwards, you can indeed fix this with make fetchindex. Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo83-A-4riwwBqXz05adXopgD%2BnY=2bXX17xyf__hWT%2BjbhQ>