Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 22 Mar 2016 05:50:37 +0100
From:      Kurt Jaeger <pi@opsec.eu>
To:        Carmel <carmel_ny@outlook.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: clamav problem
Message-ID:  <20160322045037.GN35640@home.opsec.eu>
In-Reply-To: <BLU436-SMTP4034719B612577C931FBF3808F0@phx.gbl>
References:  <FB142D1F-B9EE-4414-9380-2E6BE32B5984@FreeBSD.org> <BLU436-SMTP9119D2D6C3CB9A0EC9A7E0808D0@phx.gbl> <895F5CC6-9F5D-4A12-A8C3-E004F4157B4A@pozo.com> <BLU436-SMTP169B1685AB004BA7C80548F808E0@phx.gbl> <20160320114402.GH35640@home.opsec.eu> <BLU436-SMTP2C36C4A07B2F59B2956EB808E0@phx.gbl> <20160320154254.GI35640@home.opsec.eu> <BLU436-SMTP1278456D545EAC8F27A34D7808E0@phx.gbl> <CAN6yY1vj5Pi9uGVZVEQXs7FYCZEU8_qd2VmY00Gaz4dLRHRRbA@mail.gmail.com> <BLU436-SMTP4034719B612577C931FBF3808F0@phx.gbl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi!

> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 14:30:25 -0700, Kevin Oberman stated:
> 
> >Hmm. Let's see. A bug that may allow the defeat of a security
> >mechanism and allow a black-hat to do bad stuff before the bug con
> >even be looked at. Why would anyone have an issue with that? I mean,
> >don't we all want more zero-day vulnerabilities? (Sorry, Guess I put
> >on my sarcasm hat today.)
> 
> You are right. Hell, if I had cancer why should the doctor tell me if
> there is no cure for it. By the way, you must be a government employee.
> You know, the type thats wants to keep everything secret but pry into
> everyone else's life.

The problem report is now public, btw. No need to get personal 8-)

-- 
pi@opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                         4 years to go !



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160322045037.GN35640>