Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 17:32:35 +0000 From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> To: Thomas Mueller <mueller6724@bellsouth.net> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: security/gnupg Message-ID: <CADLo838O%2ByK5KpWb_tm3NjZyoZPvAfN24q7=7WGDfn6PY1JuMA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <C1.B9.08887.1D27E015@smtp01.insight.synacor.com> References: <C1.B9.08887.1D27E015@smtp01.insight.synacor.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3 February 2013 14:23, Thomas Mueller <mueller6724@bellsouth.net> wrote: > >> /etc/make.conf, use OPTIONS_SET=list of options. You can also use UNSET in >> the same way for the converse. Setting BATCH=yes stops the dialogs >> appearing. > >> Chris > > I want to know what ports have settable options, and might miss some. > > I guess I could > make showconfig-recursive |& tee showconfig.log , NetBSD pkgsrc has something > that serves the same function. It's also possible to set an options for one > or more but not all ports. Yup, use UNIQUENAME_SET; sudo_SET= INSULTS for example; you can get UNIQUENAME with make -C /usr/ports/security/sudo -VUNIQUENAME > I suppose, in the case of portmaster, I could run the command without a log > file, answer n when prompted whether to do the build, then immediately run > the same portmaster command again, but this time with a log file. > > I wish dialog could run on a separate screen and/or without the color. You can also use make config-recursive if you want to configure all the ports. > With NetBSD pkgsrc, I don't feel at all deprived for not having the dialog. You could then set BATCH? Can you describe what exactly you do on NetBSD, and I can show you how to do it here? Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo838O%2ByK5KpWb_tm3NjZyoZPvAfN24q7=7WGDfn6PY1JuMA>