Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 13 Sep 2015 19:40:57 +0300
From:      Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>
To:        Dmitry Sivachenko <trtrmitya@gmail.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Stable ML <stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: process scheduling and cpuset
Message-ID:  <20150913164057.GT21849@zxy.spb.ru>
In-Reply-To: <C6ADA4B7-1126-44A5-94B3-97FA79C8582A@gmail.com>
References:  <623FA99E-04E7-4D29-953A-61EE7B35CBF6@gmail.com> <20150913130920.GR3158@zxy.spb.ru> <C6ADA4B7-1126-44A5-94B3-97FA79C8582A@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 04:44:40PM +0300, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:

> 
> > On 13 сент. 2015 г., at 16:09, Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> wrote:
> > 
> > On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 02:52:08PM +0300, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
> > 
> >> Hello,
> >> 
> >> I have 32 processor machine (2x CPU E5-2650) running several CPU-bound processes (ULE scheduler).
> >> 3 processes are 32-threaded, and 8 are single threaded.
> >> 
> >> I bind all 3 32-threaded processes to CPUs 0-24 (cpuset -C -l 0-24 -p XXX).
> >> 
> >> I expect that the remaining 8 single-threaded processes will (mostly) run on the remaining 25-31 CPU cores and use (almost) 100% cpu each.
> >> 
> >> But this is not the case (according to top(1)):  they spend a lot of time on 0-24 CPUs and CPU Idle time is about 10%.
> >> 
> >> These are all purely computational programs, in idle system single-threaded programs steadily consume 100% of a core, and 32-threaded programs consume all 32 cores and idle time is zero.
> >> 
> >> Is it an ULE scheduler feature or am I doing something wrong?
> >> 
> >> The goal is to give a single-threaded program a chance to run when somebody started several 32-threaded processes.
> > 
> > You don't have 32 processor machine, you have only 16 processor
> > machine.
> > SMT/hyperthreading don't give real processor, SMT "CPU" have
> > unpredicable power and his load depend on load parent CPU.
> > 
> > For example, for my case I see such condition (simpliy) on CPU 0 and 1
> > (SMT of one real core) with rise load:
> > 
> > load 0.1  0.1
> > load 0.2  0.2
> > load 0.3  0.3
> > load 0.4  0.4
> > load 0.45 0.45
> > load 0.48 0.48
> > load 1.00 1.00\
> 
> 
> Yes I know about HT.  But how does this explain why I have 10% of CPU idle?
> 
> If I explicitly bind my single-threaded processes to the remaining CPU cores (25-32), they start to receive expected 100% of CPU and overall Idle decreases.
> 
> I just expect scheduler to do the same for me.
> 

Idle is not goal, goal is lessing task executing time.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150913164057.GT21849>