Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 20:29:34 +0000 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jev_Bj=C3=B6rsell?= <jev@ecadlabs.com> To: Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>, "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: net-mgmt/prometheus update to 1.6.0, comitter requested Message-ID: <CAGKJJV=2wCiES1PrJ9nuFV_3BzcSMebG5dRtrN4wf1fj9b31=Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <C827852E-ED97-4753-8BB7-BA09F23152A9@lerctr.org> References: <CAGKJJVk0PaeJXT20wQEdQSFc71QuGNHEPtS67HtHosdYUsTJSA@mail.gmail.com> <CAGKJJVmmNx9KWDtNd8-4ntqruFpQBk-BSXjjCN8%2BGRikVzWzOQ@mail.gmail.com> <11DAA44D-661F-4762-ABFD-78E4806D6E2E@lerctr.org> <ba6fa61a-8c5f-466e-9fea-722a923d7b14@localhost> <CAGKJJV=nEdKcq9rigjKFWH4oLNMjE88u=bP-c%2BE=gA8ZUXkDpQ@mail.gmail.com> <C827852E-ED97-4753-8BB7-BA09F23152A9@lerctr.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Great, thank you! Any feedback on port structure is welcome by me :) -Jev On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:43 AM Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> wrote: > Indeed. I=E2=80=99m working with my Mentor (adamw@, and swills@(of portm= gr@)) > and they had the issue with unknown. > > > > I=E2=80=99ll get this done. =E2=98=BA > > > > > > -- > > Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler > > Phone: +1 214-642-9640 <(214)%20642-9640> E-Mail: > ler@lerctr.org > > US Mail: 17716 Limpia Crk, Round Rock, TX 78664-7281 > > > > > > > > *From: *Jev Bj=C3=B6rsell <jev@ecadlabs.com> > *Date: *Thursday, April 20, 2017 at 1:39 PM > *To: *Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>, "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" < > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> > *Subject: *Re: Re: net-mgmt/prometheus update to 1.6.0, comitter requeste= d > > > > Hi Larry, > > > > I presume you are referring the the strings 'unknown' that appear in the > do-build: portion of the Makefile. > > > > These are set to 'unknown' on purpose, because we do not have a way of > finding out that information unless we do it dynamically at build time. > Doing dynamically is not recommended for several reasons. > > > > This data gets displayed when a user runs `prometheus -version`, and most > of the fields are only really relevant to dev builds anyway. > > > > The crucial information is the software version number which is set. > > > > You can see me exchange on the subject in the ports mailing list archive > here: > > > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2017-March/107833.html > > > > -Jev > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:23 PM ler <ler@lerctr.org> wrote: > > Can you fill in the unknown stuff in the version package or should I just > go ahead and do it? > > > > On Apr 19, 2017 at 10:22 PM, <Jev Bj=C3=B6rsell <jev@ecadlabs.com>> wrote= : > > Thanks Larry, > > > > I have updated the patch on the bug, because the upstream project has jus= t > released a minor version/bug fix release. New patch updates us to 1.6.1. > > > > Thanks, > > -Jev > > > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 1:22 PM Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> wrote: > > On 4/18/17, 2:41 PM, "Jev Bj=C3=B6rsell" <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org= on > behalf of jev@ecadlabs.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > Could I get a committer to apply my latest update patch for net-mg > mt/prometheus? > > Patch is available here: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D218737 > > Thanks so much, > -Jev > > Waiting for my mentor to approve. > > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGKJJV=2wCiES1PrJ9nuFV_3BzcSMebG5dRtrN4wf1fj9b31=Q>