Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 17:30:48 -0700 From: Andrew Klaus <andrewklaus@gmail.com> To: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Issues putting jails on their own subnet Message-ID: <CAKA4ij_vtTai0fjHT%2BaVR4nPJfwpV0hG2yM8kF2K05t==y-AFQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BP_MZEg2XhghMiM7TNyev2_5KsNG6iGyR6y0zbxSdiBznCpGw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAKA4ij9FLJA7Un8gA-Jv17Xfi9DG7Xi0qMKRwK3vUedvXKxngA@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BP_MZEg2XhghMiM7TNyev2_5KsNG6iGyR6y0zbxSdiBznCpGw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It doesn't seem to let me delete it (first thing I tried).. Gives me this error: # route delete 10.0.3.0/24 route: writing to routing socket: Address already in use delete net 10.0.3.0 fib 0: gateway uses the same route However, using the tunable, then works perfectly. Thanks! On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Nikolay Denev <nike_d@cytexbg.com> wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Actually you should be able to override this routing entry by just > deleting it, or you can also check if "net.add_addr_allfibs" sysctl can > help you. > > > --Nikolay > > > > On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Andrew Klaus <andrewklaus@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to segregate some of my jails onto their own (DMZ) subnet. >> >> Internal subnet: 10.0.3.0/24 >> DMZ subnet: 10.0.4.0/24 >> >> Both of these subnets are on my FreeBSD host, but I'm using a second >> routing table for my DMZ jails as seen here: >> >> --------------- >> setfib 1 netstat -rn >> Routing tables >> >> Internet: >> Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire >> default 10.0.4.1 UGS 0 2393945 vlan4 >> 10.0.3.0/24 link#12 U 0 0 vlan3 >> ---------------- >> >> The problem I'm facing, is when I try to connect to the DMZ'd jail from >> the >> 10.0.3.0 network, traffic comes in on vlan4 like it's supposed to, but >> replies back through on the vlan3 interface. I guess this makes sense, >> because of that second route entry (that I can't override). >> >> I've tried using PF to force the packets back through to 10.0.4.1, but it >> doesn't seem to want to work. Is the only other way to use the >> experimental vnet/vimage? >> >> Any ideas would be helpful. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Andrew >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAKA4ij_vtTai0fjHT%2BaVR4nPJfwpV0hG2yM8kF2K05t==y-AFQ>