Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:25:43 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: George Kontostanos <gkontos.mail@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Subject: Re: Use of newest version number such as 10.0 instead of current Message-ID: <4EBDA0E7.4030707@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BdUSyqwDy_AvaGkTcxPnT5tmxGF-x6Vg3va8uVTzmngRR%2BN1g@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAOgwaMv=wUb11AYwJ_RN1x1p0DGtZb6pJ4cb8R6v0ySYiNTjRw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1111111226010.882@multics.mit.edu> <CA%2BdUSyqwDy_AvaGkTcxPnT5tmxGF-x6Vg3va8uVTzmngRR%2BN1g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/11/2011 14:23, George Kontostanos wrote: > BTW I follow both stable and current lists. I have noticed that people > still ask questions in current regarding 9-RC(*) problems. > Maybe if it was clear that current is now 10 this would not happen. Actually up until the actual release we encourage users to ask about the new branch on -current, for a variety of reasons. -- "We could put the whole Internet into a book." "Too practical." Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EBDA0E7.4030707>