Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 16:36:49 +0100 From: Chris Rees <crees@bayofrum.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, 5u623l20@gmail.com Subject: Re: Force Dependent ports OPTIONS Message-ID: <536E4791.9070602@bayofrum.net> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BnPUkwUuTtyUO98g9OvB-EMVgOb6kDrDHTVfxBVMRq7xOp41Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <CA%2BnPUkz6YPKsxeUFRT8r21pTJNbBdfvZgZHtskgXejAWGB9Eqw@mail.gmail.com> <n/jDy%2B9r2e@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org> <CA%2BnPUkwUuTtyUO98g9OvB-EMVgOb6kDrDHTVfxBVMRq7xOp41Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Muhammad,
On 04/05/2014 15:09, Muhammad Moinur Rahman wrote:
> Hi Dirk,
>
> How can I enforce it from inside a ports Makefile?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
Short answer, you can't, sorry.
You'll need to test it somehow in a target;
pre-configure:
if ! openssl --help 2>&1 | grep -q 3779; then \
${ECHO_MSG} "openssl was compiled without RFC3779 option; "; \
${ECHO_MSG} "please reinstall with RFC3779 selected"; \
${FALSE}; \
fi
Not sure if anyone else has a better idea....
By the way, check that openssl --help actually tells you whether or
not RFC3779 was compiled, because I don't know :)
Chris
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?536E4791.9070602>