Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 17:06:46 +0200 From: Norbert Aschendorff <norbert.aschendorff@yahoo.de> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPv4 vs. IPv6 Ethernet Performance Message-ID: <503F8186.4070906@yahoo.de> In-Reply-To: <CA%2Bq%2BTcpkgecViB%2B9ze=UX7=UYq1YKkN690X6XAzYcpcrdZtO2w@mail.gmail.com> References: <503CE60F.8040007@yahoo.de> <loom.20120829T133814-120@post.gmane.org> <503E5C14.9090001@yahoo.de> <CA%2Bq%2BTcpkgecViB%2B9ze=UX7=UYq1YKkN690X6XAzYcpcrdZtO2w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I tested it using tcpdump: http://nopaste.info/9394068f54_nl.html The length field says for each packet 1408 bytes, so that should be OK. The Wireshark instance on the iperf server says something like "16732 bytes on wire" for the most packets (not always with 16732 bytes, but most packets over 10,000) - could that be reassembled somehow? Norbert
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?503F8186.4070906>