Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 14:54:37 +0200 From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> To: fake fake <four.troublesome.heads@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Bernt Hansson <bah@bananmonarki.se> Subject: Re: ls-F tcsh built-in command Message-ID: <20120517145437.03dd4cdf.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BrxiGBETBvdjhGUF73OSYO6xEbbgjRsxPcbs9sntB49wRyo9w@mail.gmail.com> References: <CA%2BrxiGCyQhMuVex3M1QdqEeQp_pMyf%2BcbEskahdNoO4C%2BmqoEw@mail.gmail.com> <4FB4DEC1.8020704@bananmonarki.se> <CA%2BrxiGBETBvdjhGUF73OSYO6xEbbgjRsxPcbs9sntB49wRyo9w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 17 May 2012 20:24:02 +0900, fake fake wrote: > Thank you for replying. > But I am telling 'ls-F' (tcsh built-in command), not 'ls -F'. Please see "man csh": ls-F acts like `ls -CF', unless listflags contains an `x', in which case it acts like `ls -xF'. ls-F passes its arguments to ls(1) if it is given any switches, so `alias ls ls-F' generally does the right thing. So if you use ls-F -l, the C shell will _not_ use ls-F, but call /bin/ls instead. So what you've been observing seems to be the intended behaviour. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120517145437.03dd4cdf.freebsd>