Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 23:02:21 -0800 (PST) From: Beeblebrox <zaphod@berentweb.com> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Questions re swap-on-zfs Message-ID: <1386054141012-5865623.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BtpaK0Nkw8fN-TmYqAwudHTi2RpmidNmK0UTae040AQ%2BX7NLA@mail.gmail.com> References: <1380880223590-5848720.post@n5.nabble.com> <524EEE40.5060208@gmail.com> <CACpH0McMfQ3r-n-ijL6Aoum=QoMY_FczBzu3vt%2BcYwCJkCNOzw@mail.gmail.com> <1381005634317-5849247.post@n5.nabble.com> <CA%2BtpaK0Nkw8fN-TmYqAwudHTi2RpmidNmK0UTae040AQ%2BX7NLA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks Adam, I re-shuffled my HDD and extracted the swap on the spindle HDD to a 4G partition. A poudriere run on all 4 cores produced an "out of swap space" message soon after. I first thought it must be some mistake, but later saw swap usage max to 1.9G when poudriere dropped to 1 build jail and was only building libreoffice. I can imagine what swap gets to when building 4 large ports concurrently then. It seems like code is a little larger in 11. I mean, root "/" and /usr occupy more HDD space and I never ran out of swap before. 4G ram + 4G swap would be more than enough I assumed. I'll probably bump up to 6G swap space (4 cores x 1.5G = 6G) Thanks to everyone for their input. ----- FreeBSD-11-current_amd64_root-on-zfs_RadeonKMS -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Questions-re-swap-on-zfs-tp5848720p5865623.html Sent from the freebsd-fs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1386054141012-5865623.post>