Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 06:53:14 -0500 From: Mark Felder <feld@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: panic: kmem_map too small at heavy packet traffic Message-ID: <1374839594.21160.1849239.4F1117A1@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <CA%2Bwhn7T_OyTCW_qd2tAYY6E5=whRNc6w-tDV37=wMMv4xkHA3g@mail.gmail.com> References: <CA%2Bwhn7StUGJH014tKx7TpeUomFO3RB9Sqv3DgTRNAgaM66kaPA@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2Bwhn7T_OyTCW_qd2tAYY6E5=whRNc6w-tDV37=wMMv4xkHA3g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I've been under the impression that synproxy was broken for quite some time, but I know there has been a lot of work on pf in HEAD so I can't be sure where it might stand there. Can anyone confirm/deny this? And not to discourage you, but the pf documentation does say "Routine use of this option is not recommended, however, as it breaks expected TCP protocol behavior when the server can't process the request..." However, panics are never good and hopefully someone can help you figure it out.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1374839594.21160.1849239.4F1117A1>