Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 6 Sep 2014 18:53:26 +0600
From:      Muhammad Moinur Rahman <5u623l20@gmail.com>
To:        Fedor Dikarev <fedor.dikarev@gmail.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: About Freebsd port net/ntopng
Message-ID:  <CA%2BnPUkzLPXyWTRVtu6xry1iHN2tc9o-xwHGEc9khys8fYcuJVQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA9ksCb4g1vZ36vcRerKa3=diNyAsQFh3f-fcbCX3E%2B5xNqrWg@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAA9ksCb4g1vZ36vcRerKa3=diNyAsQFh3f-fcbCX3E%2B5xNqrWg@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=E2=80=8BHi,

I am already working on upgrading to the latest. Nearly finished. Within a
day or two I will submit it.

BR,
Muhammad=E2=80=8B


On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Fedor Dikarev <fedor.dikarev@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello Muhammad Moinur Rahman!
>
> I've found that you are maintainer of net/ntopng freebsd port.
> I've tried to build ntopng and found that it's marked as BROKEN. So I
> started to analyse what's broken and find right URL for distfiles. And al=
so
> I've made some patches so now it can be build without gcc (I had build
> successfully using clang on FreeBSD 10).
> And today while I try to reproduce all of this I found that ntopng 1.2.1
> was released just few hours ago.
>
> So what your opinion, what will be better: should I send patches to you
> and there will be net/ntopng11 in ports or upgrade net/ntopng to 1.2.1 is
> just enough?
>
> --
> Fedor Dikarev
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BnPUkzLPXyWTRVtu6xry1iHN2tc9o-xwHGEc9khys8fYcuJVQ>