Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 12:28:24 -0400 From: Carmel <carmel_ny@outlook.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sane way to resolve potential conflicts in the system Message-ID: <BLU436-SMTP216A4769A78511EFEBCDFB280600@phx.gbl> In-Reply-To: <CAAdA2WNJ1ru4NunPZ1aZkndXYnK218ojB-3673FDtoBcAH-OJA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAAdA2WPZiBYxK9XL_ToAvWtQOiJ0Da7fqVBinyq10%2BMC10zz6A@mail.gmail.com> <CAOc73CC57yjqteXrZZd%2Bs2Z353r9AycG39mf9f136hGaY=iTzQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAAdA2WMJc%2Bt=mw9FZ5ScPBxg0K5t-J7VHozBPBjd_-1TzunCZw@mail.gmail.com> <20160423162910.7cd2ede2@curlew.lan> <BLU436-SMTP13BF30CFA35882760E7E8080600@phx.gbl> <CAAdA2WNJ1ru4NunPZ1aZkndXYnK218ojB-3673FDtoBcAH-OJA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 19:02:13 +0300, Odhiambo Washington stated: >I will need to look into this because I use a mixture of portupgrade >and pkg on this system. Scary? That is one of the reasons I avoid packages. I have several ports that require custom configurations, such as Postfix, Dovecot and a few others. It just doesn't pay for me to mix packages and ports. There just isn't any upside. The package system is just to juvenile right now. Until it matures, I will stay with ports. -- Carmel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BLU436-SMTP216A4769A78511EFEBCDFB280600>