Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 06:05:51 -0800 (PST) From: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Listing of all available options in ports tree for use in make.conf /ports.conf (WITHOUT_ , WITH_ as well as OPTIONS_SET /UNSET) Message-ID: <1393941951560-5891452.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <CACdU%2Bf8z_xzRJZ2V42Cemv_WgAvFhex5apkoLfrZ_-rov20EOw@mail.gmail.com> References: <1393935015572-5891423.post@n5.nabble.com> <CACdU%2Bf8z_xzRJZ2V42Cemv_WgAvFhex5apkoLfrZ_-rov20EOw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks for reply! IMHO, port knobs really should be centrally tracked/standardized. When one would like to set some options globally, it gets really ugly really fast e.g. WITH_OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS=yes WITH_OPTIMIZED_FLAGS=yes WITH_OPTIMIZATION=yes OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS=yes BUILD_OPTIMIZED=yes WITH_OCFLAGS=yes OPTIONS_SET=OCFLAGS OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS I reckon somebody had a script to printout all available options? But I may be mistaken. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Listing-of-all-available-options-in-ports-tree-for-use-in-make-conf-ports-conf-WITHOUT-WITH-as-well--tp5891423p5891452.html Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1393941951560-5891452.post>