Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 16:09:10 +0400 From: Ruslan Makhmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Ladan?= <rene@freebsd.org> Cc: Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org>, python@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFR] lang/python26 removal Message-ID: <52CA9CE6.1020608@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <CADL2u4hVqSafxYhts%2BP3jLZgyfy%2B2djeBdi53_8V4MEWHttFcw@mail.gmail.com> References: <52C948C2.4080506@freebsd.org> <52CA91A3.8040309@yandex.ru> <CADL2u4ha9wWvdU76vG6CE-yA3xZ7VCC1tqi1-QtyebCSVQeBKQ@mail.gmail.com> <52CA9855.1060002@yandex.ru> <CADL2u4hVqSafxYhts%2BP3jLZgyfy%2B2djeBdi53_8V4MEWHttFcw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
René Ladan wrote on 06.01.2014 16:00: > 2014/1/6 Ruslan Makhmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru>: >> René Ladan wrote on 06.01.2014 15:34: >> >>> 2014/1/6 Ruslan Makhmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru>: >>>> >>>> René Ladan wrote on 05.01.2014 15:57: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> lang/python26 expired a few days ago, so I patched Mk/bsd.pyton.mk to >>>>> exclude lang/python26 and patched the USE_PYTHON* lines of all ports >>>>> referring to Python < 2.7. You must remove lang/python26 manually to not >>>>> break INDEX. >>>>> >>>>> The patch is available at >>>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~rene/patches/python-to-27.diff >>>>> The bsd.python.mk patch itself is also here: >>>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~rene/patches/Mk__bsd.python.mk.diff >>>>> >>>>> mat@ already gave an "OK" for the USE_PYTHON* bumps. >>>>> >>>>> Does this patch and removing lang/python26 look OK to you? >>>>> >>>>> I'm not on python@ , so please CC me. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> René >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I'd say please go on with that. But there is two things there, that would >>>> be >>>> great to be fixed before commiting: >>>> - value of 2 need to be used instead of 2.7 in USE_PYTHON in your patch >>> >>> This is because I converted -2.7 to 2.7 etc. Are you saying that all >>> USE_PYTHON*=2.7 should be converted to USE_PYTHON*=2 and that >>> other USE_PYTHON* values are OK ? >> >> >> I just looked at it again: >> >> -2.7 and 2.7 should be converted to just `2' >> 2.x+ should be converted to just `yes' to keep it's current meaning >> >> Will this `yes'-ports actually build with 3.x - that will be checked later >> for all the tree. I have plans for this. >> > I'll redo the patch with the above two conversion rules and blame any > breakage on you :-p > > Regards, > René Ok). But please send it here for review). -- Regards, Ruslan T.O.S. Of Reality
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52CA9CE6.1020608>