Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:42:42 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Sergey Kandaurov <pluknet@gmail.com> Cc: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: panic: LK_RETRY set with incompatible flags Message-ID: <5113CB72.4080604@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAE-mSOLTN7YMytwf-DqJjowSKWnX%2B-PC-vgJM1F=p0qnfVBYRg@mail.gmail.com> References: <1137922035.2777364.1360203187367.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> <5113AF89.4070303@FreeBSD.org> <CAE-mSOLTN7YMytwf-DqJjowSKWnX%2B-PC-vgJM1F=p0qnfVBYRg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 07/02/2013 17:36 Sergey Kandaurov said the following: > I tested the patch without the (*vpp != dvp) change. > It works well. > > It's something unrelated but when doing ls -l > on server (patched) and client (unpatched) sides, > I found some inconsistency in returned stats. > Or more precisely: > > NFS server > # stat -s /pool1/user1000/.zfs/shares/.. > st_dev=2050684725 st_ino=1 st_mode=040555 st_nlink=4 st_uid=0 st_gid=0 > st_rdev=0 st_size=4 st_atime=1360251211 st_mtime=1359551493 > st_ctime=1359551493 st_birthtime=1359551493 st_blksize=4096 > st_blocks=0 st_flags=0 > > NFS client > # stat -s /home/user1000/.zfs/shares/.. > st_dev=2050684725 st_ino=7 st_mode=040555 st_nlink=2 st_uid=0 st_gid=0 > st_rdev=1377468712 st_size=2 st_atime=1360251104 st_mtime=1359551493 > st_ctime=1359551493 st_birthtime=-1 st_blksize=4096 st_blocks=3 > st_flags=0 Hmm, this looks more consistent with the earlier patch. Are you sure that you really tested the new kernel (on the server)? -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5113CB72.4080604>