Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 16:19:22 -0400 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: Rumen Telbizov <telbizov@gmail.com>, "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@ipfw.ru> Cc: "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@freebsd.org>, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>, brian@freebsd.org, "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 10.1-BETA2 possible kernel memory leak in routing table Message-ID: <5440284A.2020301@sentex.net> In-Reply-To: <CAENR%2B_XX=brNVRBOL-jeWPGSLpWZF9Gddso2FPJn5LKP3zG%2B%2Bg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAENR%2B_UVLDDrsef2W4CXCFX65EYaxeKN4MNWbgoyaZ5qDGe1Pg@mail.gmail.com> <542AAA3C.1080803@ipfw.ru> <CAENR%2B_X5KTdeb00f9NShN1YK%2BT2aY1vG5YcTCgu4aXZO=%2Bpa=g@mail.gmail.com> <542AE376.6000003@FreeBSD.org> <CAENR%2B_XX4jnD6SBi8S1dGfWM68tmcm0aE2iMVA3LDR3R8ygQYw@mail.gmail.com> <542AFAE3.9030705@FreeBSD.org> <CAENR%2B_WbntqjE4b=iZS8z30AK7gSpur00HsWP9-T_UJ7OosU8Q@mail.gmail.com> <20141001135124.GM73266@glebius.int.ru> <542C20D7.3070606@sentex.net> <20141001171646.GQ73266@glebius.int.ru> <CAENR%2B_VwWor23sX4WAfzU18z8mdRxGverUsCKcjO=L3DVSuq6g@mail.gmail.com> <542C5529.9030800@FreeBSD.org> <7AB35136-89AA-48F2-8B0E-1BA3DCD4A6BA@ipfw.ru> <CAENR%2B_Xv4iPAaOd3Vj%2BFQAZLu4%2BH3N1Rp6pd_b9UUSUu-a3j6A@mail.gmail.com> <CAENR%2B_XX=brNVRBOL-jeWPGSLpWZF9Gddso2FPJn5LKP3zG%2B%2Bg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Have these two patches been merged to RELENG_10 ? ---Mike On 10/2/2014 6:25 PM, Rumen Telbizov wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Alexander, Gleb: good news guys. The problem seems to be resolved! Good > job.Here's what I have. > > 1. I upgraded the backup firewall to 10-STABLE (r272435), applied Gleb's > patch of pf_table.c and rebuilt. Just as reported by Gleb, the leak seemed > to be reduced but it was still present and leaked a little bit of memory > upon every PF reload. > > 2. In addition to 1) I applied the second patch from Alexander on radix.c > and rebuilt the kernel. After the reboot it seems like the amount of memory > consumed by the routetbl grows a little bit temporarily after reload and > then drops back to the previous, stable amount shortly after. > > Gleb, Alexander, thank you very much for your help. I appreciate your quick > response in providing patches for this problem. I hope those 2 patches get > tested by more people and get MFC'ed into 10-STABLE soon. -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5440284A.2020301>