Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 09:55:28 -0600 From: John Nielsen <lists@jnielsen.net> To: Sami Halabi <sodynet1@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Taking bhyve step forward enterprise grade Message-ID: <B5D24D4D-68BA-4479-8FD2-8B3775055C04@jnielsen.net> In-Reply-To: <CAEW%2BogZ0e3z=VMt14MH7Yv-aRBdryi8y=Mn3=LApAGT=fx-KZQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAEW%2BogZD8ZKJJr1X8-OU3MwYx1hObskXq4gFeEBNJECjPdzZLw@mail.gmail.com> <CAEW%2BogYmHO3Jn7k3AYkFG-jZdaaHWTT40qu3Of1u%2BGH4yHmA1g@mail.gmail.com> <CAEW%2BogZ0e3z=VMt14MH7Yv-aRBdryi8y=Mn3=LApAGT=fx-KZQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Mar 19, 2016, at 8:12 AM, Sami Halabi <sodynet1@gmail.com> wrote: >=20 > hi, > are there ongoing job on taking bhyve further steps toward enterprise scal= e > like: > 1. high availability, rules on vms (like affinity rules in vmware: eg an > app vm and sql vm go together...), vmotion... > 2. network virtualization like vmware nsx... The wiki pages probably the best place for general info on bhyve current and= planned features: https://wiki.freebsd.org/bhyve Live migration is a planned feature. HA rules and other automation and orche= stration are probably beyond the scope of what bhyve itself is aiming to ach= ieve, though such features could easily be provided by additional scripts an= d tools. What specifically are you after in terms of network virtualization? Again, b= hyve itself isn't intended to be a giant umbrella but FreeBSD does support m= any networking features which could support network virtualization (and whic= h work fine with bhyve). JN
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B5D24D4D-68BA-4479-8FD2-8B3775055C04>