Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 18:29:13 +0200 From: "Andrey S. Rybak" <ra@iop.kiev.ua> To: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> Cc: freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: freebsd-upgrade Message-ID: <52825759.1050700@iop.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgnUR86X-x_uL88J8pcfNixEcGHTXE9pSOop4_QXCVRRnw@mail.gmail.com> References: <528224A6.7070701@iop.kiev.ua> <CAF6rxgnUR86X-x_uL88J8pcfNixEcGHTXE9pSOop4_QXCVRRnw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12.11.13 16:39, Eitan Adler wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Andrey S. Rybak <ra@iop.kiev.ua> wrote: >> hi all. >> it was happened that i have no upgrade my system long time. Before that i >> used for upgrading "classic" way. > This is a 'source upgrade'. > >> But in current moment as i can see the upgrading is totally changed. As i >> understand commands sequence is next: >> #freebsd-update fetch > This is a 'binary upgrade'. This will be faster and generally easier > if you fit within the "default case" of using an unmodified source > tree and sticking to releases. > > Thanks. I understand difference between source and binary updating. And source updating is my preferable method. Just i was interesting what does community use in current moment. Thank you one more time
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52825759.1050700>