Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 06:56:23 +0100 From: Enrico Migliore <enrico.migliore@fatti.com> To: Tomek CEDRO <tomek@cedro.info>, grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Arm64 Tier 1 FreeBSD 13 Phones Message-ID: <1a8e8b41-ccc3-1bb3-39fe-c599fed90297@fatti.com> In-Reply-To: <CAFYkXjnCGc=ddMmFXwJanCSFfgFNDDEWcytU4Ey7oKSd3tNAtg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAD2Ti2_wNWyzfUeD4t8iG=T8FGm8V085dc-Asqgb8r38ATdNaA@mail.gmail.com> <CAFYkXjnCGc=ddMmFXwJanCSFfgFNDDEWcytU4Ey7oKSd3tNAtg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, another way is compiling FreeBSD as a native App that runs on top iOS and Android. Tech Giants will never open the source code of their drivers. Enrico Migliore On 28/02/2023 01:09, Tomek CEDRO wrote: > On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 10:07 AM grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote: >> FreeBSD Phones... > Not really a "FreeBSD phones" just "phones" or "mobile multimedia > capable embedded devices" as anything can run on them :-) > > For instance NuttX RTOS on PinePhone takes kilobytes in total: > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGI_0yK1vws > > There will be many different operating systems soon available on this > kind of inexpensive powerful multimedia embedded systems. > > The problem is standard and compatibility. > > Unless vendor does not provide complete set of open source drivers and > firmwares there will be no move forward. > > Unless application written for one won't run on another there will be > no move forward. > > Unless there is no overcomplicated SDK and toolchain with libraries > that have lifespan shorter than a bread there will be no move forward. > > Because who needs bare OS/RTOS with no useful familiar applications. > > :-) > -- Questa email è stata esaminata alla ricerca di virus dal software antivirus Avast. www.avast.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1a8e8b41-ccc3-1bb3-39fe-c599fed90297>