Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 27 Nov 2022 04:05:34 +0000
From:      0x1eef <0x1eef@protonmail.com>
To:        Paul Procacci <pprocacci@gmail.com>
Cc:        "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: High CPU usage / high number of interrupts
Message-ID:  <q3hX_VlFP_pJ3Br_uKgFiIjzZbBQ4s72Fd6G2OJ7Tw4d7N4niMf2XMGcGjVv2JdA0WNtKapSF2G-JhrGo-bJaWFxd2EQa4Kq0eIULXgG7o8=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFbbPugTu1KZzq9HA32Z35zDpRYM9Teyu3yPvnL1SnvLWaq82Q@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <NjJeOo65XxAgvh49UV6bzpgNunj1LH1uXy1xnv5QJgjgZfc0xtbKs7PBJb6Ub9LJaPwBKlf94hcsl_Qqt5Yrh_2-BuX5j4MjAdwSGwWEMs4=@protonmail.com> <CAFbbPuiQtNa0BeZ7X0UhjFyynhFPKFXcF6NE2CZ7ra7hCgYUnw@mail.gmail.com> <gK0wIYffyGap3mFoEXClIP-k57b-uioxjqsI5T0IaFv6p3SymjqtzfMyjnSY5r1ZNgEbCod8NsqvshcuFYim-v9ELI3p8ZE3U0Nxprxmx9E=@protonmail.com> <CAFbbPuh-OEYeFSoYJpz87uRsWFoioifcwNVZdPdPDdczaLNPHg@mail.gmail.com> <dnfwW7jk8EC9QhEpgjgE3pJR_NcT6--f4RwFCxb_oI27HdORbKQK4LunJ4J4PZMhLnrAvywH-7WQNTCCS7_OQE8ztKG0e9do7q9y3ZJoevw=@protonmail.com> <CAFbbPugTu1KZzq9HA32Z35zDpRYM9Teyu3yPvnL1SnvLWaq82Q@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
The results are sort of interesting. At first, UE_INTERRUPT_OK was at 3k+ for the USB mouse. I unplugged the mouse, and then the keyboard jumped from 0 to 1k+ for UE_INTERRUPT_OK.

I have since reattached the mouse, and now both the mouse and the keyboard have a rising interrupt count. I would guess they jump by 20, or 30 interrupts every 2-3 seconds, with the keyboard jumping with a higher frequency.

Paste

ugen0.1: <Intel XHCI root HUB> at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=SUPER (5.0Gbps) pwr=SAVE (0mA)

{
UE_CONTROL_OK : 0
UE_ISOCHRONOUS_OK : 0
UE_BULK_OK : 0
UE_INTERRUPT_OK : 0
UE_CONTROL_FAIL : 0
UE_ISOCHRONOUS_FAIL : 0
UE_BULK_FAIL : 0
UE_INTERRUPT_FAIL : 0
}

ugen0.2: <Realtek USB 10/100/1000 LAN> at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=ON (350mA)

{
UE_CONTROL_OK : 7969
UE_ISOCHRONOUS_OK : 0
UE_BULK_OK : 11224
UE_INTERRUPT_OK : 0
UE_CONTROL_FAIL : 0
UE_ISOCHRONOUS_FAIL : 0
UE_BULK_FAIL : 94
UE_INTERRUPT_FAIL : 0
}

ugen0.4: <Sonix Technology Co., Ltd. Integrated Camera> at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=ON (500mA)

{
UE_CONTROL_OK : 10
UE_ISOCHRONOUS_OK : 0
UE_BULK_OK : 0
UE_INTERRUPT_OK : 0
UE_CONTROL_FAIL : 0
UE_ISOCHRONOUS_FAIL : 0
UE_BULK_FAIL : 0
UE_INTERRUPT_FAIL : 0
}

ugen0.6: <vendor 0x0cf3 product 0xe500> at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL (12Mbps) pwr=ON (100mA)

{
UE_CONTROL_OK : 16
UE_ISOCHRONOUS_OK : 53214
UE_BULK_OK : 0
UE_INTERRUPT_OK : 9
UE_CONTROL_FAIL : 0
UE_ISOCHRONOUS_FAIL : 0
UE_BULK_FAIL : 0
UE_INTERRUPT_FAIL : 0
}

ugen0.5: <vendor 0x30fa USB OPTICAL MOUSE> at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=LOW (1.5Mbps) pwr=ON (100mA)

{
UE_CONTROL_OK : 11
UE_ISOCHRONOUS_OK : 0
UE_BULK_OK : 0
UE_INTERRUPT_OK : 1707
UE_CONTROL_FAIL : 0
UE_ISOCHRONOUS_FAIL : 0
UE_BULK_FAIL : 0
UE_INTERRUPT_FAIL : 0
}

ugen0.3: <SINO WEALTH Gaming KB> at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL (12Mbps) pwr=ON (500mA)

{
UE_CONTROL_OK : 21
UE_ISOCHRONOUS_OK : 0
UE_BULK_OK : 0
UE_INTERRUPT_OK : 1790
UE_CONTROL_FAIL : 0
UE_ISOCHRONOUS_FAIL : 0
UE_BULK_FAIL : 0
UE_INTERRUPT_FAIL : 0
}
Best,
0x1eef

------- Original Message -------
On Sunday, November 27th, 2022 at 12:31 AM, Paul Procacci <pprocacci@gmail.com> wrote:

> usbconfig dump_stats
>
> Can you provide the output of the above? Run that a couple of times if you don't mind and do your very best to provide any rates of increases for any of the fields. An estimation would be perfectly fine.
> Thanks,
> Paul
>
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 10:09 PM 0x1eef <0x1eef@protonmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> Can you determine if irq 128 is being shared by any devices?
>>
>> I couldn't determine that from dmesg.boot, but I think there could be some useful information in that file. I attached the file to this e-mail. Thank you!
>>
>> Best,
>> 0x1eef
>>
>> Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.
>>
>> ------- Original Message -------
>> On Saturday, November 26th, 2022 at 8:49 PM, Paul Procacci <pprocacci@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Can you determine if irq 128 is being shared by any devices?
>>> Usually this information can be found in `dmesg' or '/var/run/dmesg.boot'.
>>> vmstat indeed shows a device but it sometimes doesn't show all the devices sharing that IRQ. It's possible you're being misled by vmstat.
>>> Just trying to get the complete picture here of devices. ;)
>>> Thanks,
>>> Paul Procacci
>>>
>>> On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 6:21 PM 0x1eef <0x1eef@protonmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi !
>>>>
>>>>> Out of curiosity, have you pulled a usb device one by one until the interrupts disappear?
>>>>
>>>> I have three USB devices connected: mouse, keyboard, and an ethernet adapter.
>>>> I tried to remove each one by one, and I did not see the interrupt rate change.
>>>> I have also tried a cold boot without any USB devices connected, and the interrupt rate was about the same too.
>>>>
>>>> I don't know if it could be related, but there's a trackpad connected to the laptop that does not work. Maybe it has no relation to the issue, but setting "hw.psm.synaptics_support" to "0" also did not help.
>>>>
>>>> When Chromium loses focus, CPU usage usually drops to 0% and does not go above 10% - for as long as I am not using Chromium. I am using the i915 / drm kernel modules.. I saw another report of high CPU usage related to using those two kernel modules, but I wasn't able to identify that as the problem in my case.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the help.
>>>>
>>>> Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.
>>>>
>>>> ------- Original Message -------
>>>> On Saturday, November 26th, 2022 at 8:06 PM, Paul Procacci <pprocacci@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hey,
>>>>>
>>>>> Not sure of the problem, but I don't see the correlation between Chrome and any usb driver.
>>>>> Out of curiosity, have you pulled a usb device one by one until the interrupts disappear?
>>>>> I'd be curious to know which device is slamming the system.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Paul
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 6:02 PM 0x1eef <0x1eef@protonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi, everyone!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When I use Chromium, I see a high rate of CPU usage across all four cores. The rate can be anywhere from 20% to 50%, even above that. I am not doing anything intensive, just browsing twitter, reddit, YouTube or GitHub. It has been like this since I installed FreeBSD, but since it's not a blocker I have been lazy about looking into it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't know why it happens. I can see that there are a high number of interrupts on 'xhci0', and that seems to carry over to each CPU core as well:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # vmstat -i
>>>>>> interrupt total rate
>>>>>> irq1: atkbd0 50 0
>>>>>> irq9: acpi0 403 0
>>>>>> cpu0:timer 30716618 98
>>>>>> cpu1:timer 25457926 81
>>>>>> cpu2:timer 34344531 109
>>>>>> cpu3:timer 25542867 81
>>>>>> irq128: xhci0 328107434 1044
>>>>>> irq130: nvme0:admin 15 0
>>>>>> irq131: nvme0:io0 701041 2
>>>>>> irq132: nvme0:io1 692045 2
>>>>>> irq133: nvme0:io2 792760 3
>>>>>> irq134: nvme0:io3 693091 2
>>>>>> irq135: hdac0 1718425 5
>>>>>> irq136: vgapci0 6273295 20
>>>>>> Total 455040501 1448
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # dmesg | grep xhci0
>>>>>> xhci0: <Intel Ice Lake-LP USB 3.1 controller> mem 0x95110000-0x9511ffff at device 20.0 on pci0
>>>>>> xhci0: 32 bytes context size, 64-bit DMAusbus0 on xhci0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It might also be helpful to know that I tried OpenBSD on the same computer but it was unusable for a similar reason: 95%+ interrupts on CPU. The impact that had made all tasks extremely slow. On FreeBSD it is not as bad, but I still think think it is not normal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can anyone suggest what might be wrong, tips to debug, etc ? If more information is needed, please let me know. Thanks for your time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,0x1eef
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> __________________
>>>>>
>>>>> :(){ :|:& };:
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> __________________
>>>
>>> :(){ :|:& };:
>
> --
>
> __________________
>
> :(){ :|:& };:
[-- Attachment #2 --]
<div style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">The results are sort of interesting. At first, UE_INTERRUPT_OK was at 3k+ for the USB mouse. I unplugged the mouse, and then the keyboard jumped from 0 to 1k+ for UE_INTERRUPT_OK.&nbsp;</div><div style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;"><br></div><div style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">I have since reattached the mouse, and now both the mouse and the keyboard have a rising interrupt count. I would guess they jump by 20, or 30 interrupts every 2-3 seconds, with the keyboard jumping with a higher frequency.</div><div style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;"><br></div><div style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">Paste</div><div style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;"><br></div><div style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;"><span>ugen0.1: &lt;Intel XHCI root HUB&gt; at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=SUPER (5.0Gbps) pwr=SAVE (0mA)</span><div><br></div><div><span>{</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_CONTROL_OK &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; : 0</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_ISOCHRONOUS_OK &nbsp; : 0</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_BULK_OK &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;: 0</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_INTERRUPT_OK &nbsp; &nbsp; : 0</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_CONTROL_FAIL &nbsp; &nbsp; : 0</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_ISOCHRONOUS_FAIL : 0</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_BULK_FAIL &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;: 0</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_INTERRUPT_FAIL &nbsp; : 0</span></div><div><span>}</span></div><div><br></div><div><span>ugen0.2: &lt;Realtek USB 10/100/1000 LAN&gt; at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=ON (350mA)</span></div><div><br></div><div><span>{</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_CONTROL_OK &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; : 7969</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_ISOCHRONOUS_OK &nbsp; : 0</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_BULK_OK &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;: 11224</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_INTERRUPT_OK &nbsp; &nbsp; : 0</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_CONTROL_FAIL &nbsp; &nbsp; : 0</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_ISOCHRONOUS_FAIL : 0</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_BULK_FAIL &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;: 94</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_INTERRUPT_FAIL &nbsp; : 0</span></div><div><span>}</span></div><div><br></div><div><span>ugen0.4: &lt;Sonix Technology Co., Ltd. Integrated Camera&gt; at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=ON (500mA)</span></div><div><br></div><div><span>{</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_CONTROL_OK &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; : 10</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_ISOCHRONOUS_OK &nbsp; : 0</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_BULK_OK &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;: 0</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_INTERRUPT_OK &nbsp; &nbsp; : 0</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_CONTROL_FAIL &nbsp; &nbsp; : 0</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_ISOCHRONOUS_FAIL : 0</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_BULK_FAIL &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;: 0</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_INTERRUPT_FAIL &nbsp; : 0</span></div><div><span>}</span></div><div><br></div><div><span>ugen0.6: &lt;vendor 0x0cf3 product 0xe500&gt; at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL (12Mbps) pwr=ON (100mA)</span></div><div><br></div><div><span>{</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_CONTROL_OK &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; : 16</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_ISOCHRONOUS_OK &nbsp; : 53214</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_BULK_OK &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;: 0</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_INTERRUPT_OK &nbsp; &nbsp; : 9</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_CONTROL_FAIL &nbsp; &nbsp; : 0</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_ISOCHRONOUS_FAIL : 0</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_BULK_FAIL &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;: 0</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_INTERRUPT_FAIL &nbsp; : 0</span></div><div><span>}</span></div><div><br></div><div><span>ugen0.5: &lt;vendor 0x30fa USB OPTICAL MOUSE&gt; at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=LOW (1.5Mbps) pwr=ON (100mA)</span></div><div><br></div><div><span>{</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_CONTROL_OK &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; : 11</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_ISOCHRONOUS_OK &nbsp; : 0</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_BULK_OK &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;: 0</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_INTERRUPT_OK &nbsp; &nbsp; : 1707</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_CONTROL_FAIL &nbsp; &nbsp; : 0</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_ISOCHRONOUS_FAIL : 0</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_BULK_FAIL &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;: 0</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_INTERRUPT_FAIL &nbsp; : 0</span></div><div><span>}</span></div><div><br></div><div><span>ugen0.3: &lt;SINO WEALTH Gaming KB&gt; at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL (12Mbps) pwr=ON (500mA)</span></div><div><br></div><div><span>{</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_CONTROL_OK &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; : 21</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_ISOCHRONOUS_OK &nbsp; : 0</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_BULK_OK &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;: 0</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_INTERRUPT_OK &nbsp; &nbsp; : 1790</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_CONTROL_FAIL &nbsp; &nbsp; : 0</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_ISOCHRONOUS_FAIL : 0</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_BULK_FAIL &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;: 0</span></div><div><span>&nbsp; &nbsp; UE_INTERRUPT_FAIL &nbsp; : 0</span></div><div><span>}</span></div><span></span><br></div><div style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">Best,</div><div style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">0x1eef</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;"><br></div><div class="protonmail_quote">
        ------- Original Message -------<br>
        On Sunday, November 27th, 2022 at 12:31 AM, Paul Procacci &lt;pprocacci@gmail.com&gt; wrote:<br><br>
        <blockquote class="protonmail_quote" type="cite">
            <div dir="ltr">
<pre class="gmail-bz_comment_text">usbconfig dump_stats</pre><div>Can you provide the output of the above?  Run that a couple of times if you don't mind and do your very best to provide any rates of increases for any of the fields.  An estimation would be perfectly fine.<br><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Paul<br></div>

</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="gmail_attr" dir="ltr">On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 10:09 PM 0x1eef &lt;<a href="mailto:0x1eef@protonmail.com" rel="noreferrer nofollow noopener" target="_blank">0x1eef@protonmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class="gmail_quote"><div style="font-family:Arial;font-size:14px">&gt; <span style="font-family:system-ui,sans-serif;display:inline">Can you determine if irq 128 is being shared by any devices?</span></div><div style="font-family:Arial;font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:system-ui,sans-serif;display:inline"><br></span></div><div style="font-size:14px">I couldn't determine that from dmesg.boot, but I think there could be some useful information in that file. I attached the file to this e-mail. Thank you!</div><div style="font-size:14px"><br></div><div style="font-size:14px">Best,</div><div style="font-size:14px">0x1eef</div><div style="font-family:Arial;font-size:14px"><br></div>
<div style="font-family:Arial;font-size:14px">
    <div>

            </div>

            <div>
        Sent with <a target="_blank" rel="noreferrer nofollow noopener" href="https://proton.me/">Proton Mail</a> secure email.
    </div>
</div>
<div style="font-family:Arial;font-size:14px"><br></div><div>
        ------- Original Message -------<br>
        On Saturday, November 26th, 2022 at 8:49 PM, Paul Procacci &lt;<a target="_blank" href="mailto:pprocacci@gmail.com" rel="noreferrer nofollow noopener">pprocacci@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br><br>
        <blockquote type="cite">
            <div dir="ltr"><div><div>Can you determine if irq 128 is being shared by any devices?<br></div>Usually this information can be found in `dmesg' or '/var/run/dmesg.boot'.<br><br></div><div>vmstat indeed shows a device but it sometimes doesn't show all the devices sharing that IRQ.  It's possible you're being misled by vmstat.</div><div>Just trying to get the complete picture here of devices.  ;)<br><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Paul Procacci<br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 6:21 PM 0x1eef &lt;<a target="_blank" rel="noreferrer nofollow noopener" href="mailto:0x1eef@protonmail.com">0x1eef@protonmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div style="font-family:Arial;font-size:14px">Hi !</div><div style="font-family:Arial;font-size:14px"><br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:system-ui,sans-serif;display:inline">&gt; Out of curiosity, have you pulled a usb device one by one until the interrupts disappear?</span><br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;font-size:14px"><br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;font-size:14px">I have three USB devices connected: mouse, keyboard, and an ethernet adapter. </div><div style="font-family:Arial;font-size:14px">I tried to remove each one by one, and I did not see the interrupt rate change.</div><div style="font-family:Arial;font-size:14px">I have also tried a cold boot without any USB devices connected, and the interrupt rate was about the same too.</div><div style="font-family:Arial;font-size:14px"><br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;font-size:14px">I don't know if it could be related, but there's a trackpad connected to the laptop that does not work. Maybe it has no relation to the issue, but setting "<span>hw.psm.synaptics_support" to "0" also did not help.</span></div><div style="font-family:Arial;font-size:14px"><span><br></span></div><div style="font-family:Arial;font-size:14px"><span>When Chromium loses focus, CPU usage usually drops to 0% and does not go above 10% - for as long as I am not using Chromium. I am using the i915 / drm kernel modules.. I saw another report of high CPU usage related to using those two kernel modules, but I wasn't able to identify that as the problem in my case.</span></div><div style="font-family:Arial;font-size:14px"><span><br></span></div><div style="font-family:Arial;font-size:14px"><span>Thanks for the help. </span></div><div style="font-family:Arial;font-size:14px"><span><br></span></div>
<div style="font-family:Arial;font-size:14px">
    <div>

            </div>

            <div>
        Sent with <a target="_blank" href="https://proton.me/" rel="noreferrer nofollow noopener">Proton Mail</a> secure email.
    </div>
</div>
<div style="font-family:Arial;font-size:14px"><br></div><div>
        ------- Original Message -------<br>
        On Saturday, November 26th, 2022 at 8:06 PM, Paul Procacci &lt;<a target="_blank" rel="noreferrer nofollow noopener" href="mailto:pprocacci@gmail.com">pprocacci@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br><br>
        <blockquote type="cite">
            <div dir="ltr"><div>Hey,</div><div><br></div><div>Not sure of the problem, but I don't see the correlation between Chrome and any usb driver.<br></div><div>Out of curiosity, have you pulled a usb device one by one until the interrupts disappear?<br><br></div><div>I'd be curious to know which device is slamming the system.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Paul<br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="gmail_attr" dir="ltr">On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 6:02 PM 0x1eef &lt;<a target="_blank" href="mailto:0x1eef@protonmail.com" rel="noreferrer nofollow noopener">0x1eef@protonmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class="gmail_quote"><div style="font-family:Arial;font-size:14px"><span style="line-height:1.5">Hi, everyone!</span><div style="line-height:1.5"><br></div><div style="line-height:1.5">When I use Chromium, I see a high rate of CPU usage across all four cores. The rate can be anywhere from 20% to 50%, even above that. I am not doing anything intensive, just browsing twitter, reddit, YouTube or GitHub. It has been like this since I installed FreeBSD, but since it's not a blocker I have been lazy about looking into it.</div><div style="line-height:1.5"><br></div><div style="line-height:1.5">I don't know why it happens. I can see that there are a high number of interrupts on 'xhci0', and that seems to carry over to each CPU core as well:</div><div style="line-height:1.5"><br></div><div style="line-height:1.5"><span># vmstat -i            </span><div><span>interrupt                          total       rate</span></div><div><span>irq1: atkbd0                          50          0</span></div><div><span>irq9: acpi0                          403          0</span></div><div><span>cpu0:timer                      30716618         98</span></div><div><span>cpu1:timer                      25457926         81</span></div><div><span>cpu2:timer                      34344531        109</span></div><div><span>cpu3:timer                      25542867         81</span></div><div><span>irq128: xhci0                  328107434       1044</span></div><div><span>irq130: nvme0:admin                   15          0</span></div><div><span>irq131: nvme0:io0                 701041          2</span></div><div><span>irq132: nvme0:io1                 692045          2</span></div><div><span>irq133: nvme0:io2                 792760          3</span></div><div><span>irq134: nvme0:io3                 693091          2</span></div><div><span>irq135: hdac0                    1718425          5</span></div><div><span>irq136: vgapci0                  6273295         20</span></div><div><span>Total                          455040501       1448</span></div><span></span><br></div><div style="line-height:1.5"><br></div><div style="line-height:1.5"><span># dmesg | grep xhci0</span><div><span>xhci0: &lt;Intel Ice Lake-LP USB 3.1 controller&gt; mem 0x95110000-0x9511ffff at device 20.0 on pci0</span></div><div><span>xhci0: 32 bytes context size, 64-bit DMA</span></div><span>usbus0 on xhci0</span><br></div><div style="line-height:1.5"><br></div><div style="line-height:1.5">It might also be helpful to know that I tried OpenBSD on the same computer but it was unusable for a similar reason: 95%+ interrupts on CPU. The impact that had made all tasks extremely slow. On FreeBSD it is not as bad, but I still think  think it is not normal.</div><div style="line-height:1.5"><br></div><div style="line-height:1.5">Can anyone suggest what might be wrong, tips to debug, etc ? If more information is needed, please let me know. Thanks for your time.</div><div style="line-height:1.5"><br></div><div style="line-height:1.5">Best,</div><span style="line-height:1.5">0x1eef</span><br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;font-size:14px"><br></div>
<div style="font-family:Arial;font-size:14px">
    <div></div>

            <div><br></div>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div dir="ltr">__________________<br><br>:(){ :|:&amp; };:</div>

        </blockquote><br>
    </div></blockquote></div><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div dir="ltr">__________________<br><br>:(){ :|:&amp; };:</div>

        </blockquote><br>
    </div></blockquote></div><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature" dir="ltr">__________________<br><br>:(){ :|:&amp; };:</div>

        </blockquote><br>
    </div>

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?q3hX_VlFP_pJ3Br_uKgFiIjzZbBQ4s72Fd6G2OJ7Tw4d7N4niMf2XMGcGjVv2JdA0WNtKapSF2G-JhrGo-bJaWFxd2EQa4Kq0eIULXgG7o8=>