Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 18:55:26 +0100 From: Laszlo Danielisz <laszlo_danielisz@yahoo.com> To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf rules vs DHCP Message-ID: <0316C1AC163245A1808EC0001AFCF048@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <CAFpgnrPi140TaSTyz_5XHDQSc_pxTsLhOAsjq-6yC2gN-8kd-w@mail.gmail.com> References: <33ED1440B7AE4229B166A4CE4C131DF6@yahoo.com> <CAFpgnrPi140TaSTyz_5XHDQSc_pxTsLhOAsjq-6yC2gN-8kd-w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I changed to fix address, so I don't have any more issues with that. @Kevin, yes I'm using interfaces, is there any what not using them in pf.conf? -- Laszlo Danielisz Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) On 2012 December 2 Sunday at 12:04 AM, Kevin Wilcox wrote: > > On Dec 1, 2012 3:55 PM, "Laszlo Danielisz" <laszlo_danielisz@yahoo.com (mailto:laszlo_danielisz@yahoo.com)> wrote: > > > > Hi Everybody, > > > > Today I just found out that my pf rules are not loaded on boot if I configure my machine's interface with DHCP > If you use your interface in your rules, for example, > pass in on em0 > then you can tell pf to adapt to a changing IP on that interface with > pass in on (em0) > This works for interfaces with DHCP-provided addresses but introduces some ambiguity. > kmw > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0316C1AC163245A1808EC0001AFCF048>