Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 16 Jan 2014 23:21:29 +0200
From:      Mikolaj Golub <trociny@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Devin Teske <dteske@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, "Teske, Devin" <Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com>
Subject:   Re: MFC r258588: Fix for VIMAGE
Message-ID:  <20140116212128.GA11477@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG=rPVdByXCHELtWZE8h28=KLYXMS6rKUBtgARjUzq1_jn8GUg@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <4BDBE950-849D-4FBF-9F62-F08200A22F15@fisglobal.com> <20140112121802.GA16750@gmail.com> <CAG=rPVdByXCHELtWZE8h28=KLYXMS6rKUBtgARjUzq1_jn8GUg@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 04:20:32PM -0800, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 4:18 AM, Mikolaj Golub <trociny@freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:12:47AM +0000, Teske, Devin wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I recently updated from 9.2-R to stable/9 and found that many times while
> > > attempting to shut down a vimage jail, that the box would crash. So I
> > found
> > > SVN r258588 in HEAD, merged it into my stable/9 kernel, rebooted.. and
> > > problem is now solved.
> > >
> > > Any objects to merging r258588 to stable/9?
> >
> > Ah, it looks like I was responsible for that bug. Craig, thank you for
> > fixing it. I think it should definitely be merged to stable/9.
> >
> > BTW, wouldn't increasing IPFW_NAT_VNET_ORDER instead of
> > IPFW_NAT_SI_SUB_FIREWALL fix the issue? It looks a little better to me.
> > Also, I think it would be good to have some coment in the code why
> > this order was chosen. Or better -- to export startup order
> > declarations from ip_fw2.c to ip_fw_private.h and use it for ip_fw_nat
> > too, so it would become self-documenting and not break if one decides
> > to change the ordering in ipfw module.
> >
> 
> 
> I tried to implement the least intrusive change to fix the problem,
> since I am not so familiar with VIMAGE / VNET and module order loading
> issues.
> 
> If you have a cleaner fix in mind, I would say, go for it.

Ok, I might update it later. But for now just merging r258588 to
stable/9 would be helpful. Devin, as I understood, you wanted to merge
it? Will you do this?

-- 
Mikolaj Golub



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140116212128.GA11477>