Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 27 Dec 2011 14:37:02 -0759
From:      David Thiel <lx@redundancy.redundancy.org>
To:        Xin LI <delphij@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: SU+J systems do not fsck themselves
Message-ID:  <20111227223638.GK45484@redundancy.redundancy.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAGMYy3t3Rv006qvBCHr4kdbM86andkr5mRkvaGYw5CETO1XHkg@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20111227215330.GI45484@redundancy.redundancy.org> <CAGMYy3t3Rv006qvBCHr4kdbM86andkr5mRkvaGYw5CETO1XHkg@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 02:29:03PM -0800, Xin LI wrote:
> I'm not sure if your experiments are right here, the second log shows
> you're running it read-only, which is likely caused by running it on
> live file system.  

Yes, this most recent instance is me running it on a live FS, because 
I'm using that machine to type this right now. :) However, I've had the 
issues fixed in single-user on other systems and had the problems go 
away. At least for a bit.

>     - use journalled fsck;
>     - use normal fsck to check if the journalled fsck did the right thing.

When you say "use journalled fsck", what's the proper way to initiate 
that? I don't see any journal-related options in the man page.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111227223638.GK45484>