Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 24 Aug 2015 21:03:37 +0200
From:      Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>
To:        Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Matthieu Volat <mazhe@alkumuna.eu>, ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [HEADSUP] portmaster/portupgrade support for new features
Message-ID:  <20150824190337.GK93486@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAH7qZftLqsNeF8bKq1uRgoafOVLSjqW1mEHDwEamjBZeMpjYcA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20150629092226.GL68142@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20150824135802.GF93486@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20150824192710.08c77060@freedom> <20150824185412.GJ93486@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <CAH7qZftLqsNeF8bKq1uRgoafOVLSjqW1mEHDwEamjBZeMpjYcA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--yr6OvWOSyJed8q4v
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:58:37AM -0700, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Are you going to keep support for the "old" way too? This is kinda crucial
> for us (and possible other people) in order to properly build off-the-tree
> (private) ports. Thanks!
>=20
Oh sure, it will be backward compatible. I will be transparent for all ports
that are not flagged as flavors or subpackages.

We are not removing a feature, neither replacing one, just adding a new one=
 so
tools that work on the ports tree should learn about that new feature to not
fail on them.

Best regards,
Bapt

--yr6OvWOSyJed8q4v
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iEYEARECAAYFAlXbaokACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExQCACfcJnMJ0e+6sYxiRcUOMKQoBHT
PBMAoLrMmMT1Bt0F0JfEfCQYEBaGeoyo
=T6dL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--yr6OvWOSyJed8q4v--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150824190337.GK93486>