Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 15:13:49 -0400 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: Karl Denninger <tickerguydenninger@gmail.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Two odd problems with STABLE-10 r262921 Message-ID: <531F606D.1030203@sentex.net> In-Reply-To: <CAHCMRk8VM-kyH6JO9t_v8V8=nBAzCiJO-4_AzMPmcWhQTUwHdw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAHCMRk_=s%2B2LYr-pLkt7LJK3LcWSiomtLb_HhfUrj4VMUHjQVQ@mail.gmail.com> <20140311155948.GR32089@funkthat.com> <CAHCMRk8VM-kyH6JO9t_v8V8=nBAzCiJO-4_AzMPmcWhQTUwHdw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/11/2014 1:24 PM, Karl Denninger wrote: > Yeah it hasn't changed...... I turned on verbose logging and I'm not > getting anything in the logs on it -- what's even more-odd is that I can > telnet to port 25 on the MX gateway and hand-feed an email in there, and it > works. If I turn off the signatures, it ALSO works. > Mar 11 12:13:59 NewFS sm-mta[11023]: s2BGax4D095381: SYSERR(root): putbody: > write error: Permission denied > Mar 11 12:13:59 NewFS sm-mta[11023]: s2BGax4D095381: SYSERR(root): timeout > writing message to gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com.: Permission denied My initial guess is also firewall issue (permission denied).. A tcpdump of the packets after the sending host could help verify that. Perhaps a long shot, but the bug fixed in this commit http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=263029 might also point to such behaviour, if states were being prematurely being expired ? I am thinking it would be a pretty busy box. Also, for debugging sendmail issues, I usually crank up on the command line given the Queue ID of Is2BFqO9e075993 sendmail -q -qIs2AKaMQp067733 -OLogLevel=15 -v ---Mike -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?531F606D.1030203>