Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 26 Jan 2014 13:35:47 +0000
From:      "Gary J. Hayers" <gary@hayers.org>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?
Message-ID:  <52E50F33.6080307@hayers.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAHcXP%2Bc3-fAhuwdBoHAmks3ugA_-G_pasYtavvsrdYdTJqXmkg@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAHcXP%2Bf6e-t--XbQPTH1goJp_CL7P=zTj5trZVWd4YZ_EsO9gw@mail.gmail.com> <52E2FA36.5080106@marino.st> <CAHcXP%2BfRDeKXjz0_sifgzeXC2dA-eDnoV5NH1yvF2D6R8JRmAg@mail.gmail.com> <52E303CB.6020304@marino.st> <CAHcXP%2Be9p2HrQ=M9HmPecMbWtXRuYPzH9kwfLGqgdrUrhvLuEA@mail.gmail.com> <52E30990.2060903@marino.st> <CAHcXP%2BfQC-N4ZKpmpaCQSeYnw4WqOJ4T4pdsoMC6NpshsOm6sQ@mail.gmail.com> <52E398FF.9000300@FreeBSD.org> <CAHcXP%2Bd8a-dcaMHM0y=7PcBReZy6J8eaANLHTDBb-=fM4cmjVw@mail.gmail.com> <52E50DBA.4010807@hayers.org> <CAHcXP%2Bc3-fAhuwdBoHAmks3ugA_-G_pasYtavvsrdYdTJqXmkg@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On 26/01/2014 13:32, Big Lebowski wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Gary J. Hayers <gary@hayers.org> wrote:
>>Suspect this would work, however, the more committers the less the quality
>> of work?
> Is there any evidence to support that argument? Or is it just a fear of
> that? At any point if that happens, then this can be revoked, the selection
> can be tighter, things can be adjusted, nothing is written in stone. Also,
> people were mentioning existing commiters to be sloppy and problematic,
> we've months of waiting for PR's to be taken care of, and there are still
> ports accepted that dont work at all - is that this work quality we're so
> troubled for?
>
> B.

That's a fear admittedly, but your solution would take care of that, 
would that also mean a bigger portmgr team too?

-- 

Regards,
Gary J. Hayers
gary@hayers.org

PGP Signature
http://www.hayers.org/pgp



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52E50F33.6080307>