Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 13:22:50 +0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: your thoughts on a particualar ipfw action. Message-ID: <5ca6bec5-0cff-b9f0-8d1e-abc858e32703@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <CAHu1Y72jggDjv1uCdS6SMez9nUEPVHvLZHkZP9vFu-VqA5SuGA@mail.gmail.com> References: <20160805024301.H56585@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <b4eb71be-9490-5c22-d22b-f6a1612e38d3@freebsd.org> <CAHu1Y72jggDjv1uCdS6SMez9nUEPVHvLZHkZP9vFu-VqA5SuGA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/08/2016 12:15 PM, Michael Sierchio wrote: > Wouldn't it make sense to use the ISO Numeric Code / UN M49 Numerical Code? actually it doesn't make sense. the source of data doesn't have that information in it so it would require a whole layer of mapping, including downloads. and it would have to cope with unexpected ambiguities and mismatches.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5ca6bec5-0cff-b9f0-8d1e-abc858e32703>