Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 10:24:45 +0100 (BST) From: Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bris.ac.uk> To: benjamin.villain@gmail.com, mexas@bris.ac.uk Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em(4) regression between r289975 and r300212 Message-ID: <201605230924.u4N9Oj70055801@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <CAHx%2BAby8VKRsAHCoJbP5D=BK4VFYVpOkXRxiaTPLAM7DEF_KKw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>From benjamin.villain@gmail.com Mon May 23 10:22:53 2016 > >Hi Anton, > >I have the same behavior on my workstation. I just applied K. Macy's patch >and it seems to work for now. Looks like it's been committed already: r300372 | avg | 2016-05-21 15:51:49 +0100 (Sat, 21 May 2016) | 5 lines Changed paths: M /head/sys/kern/subr_taskqueue.c M /head/sys/sys/_task.h M /head/sys/sys/taskqueue.h fix loss of taskqueue wakeups (introduced in r300113) Submitted by: kmacy Tested by: dchagin I'm building r300487 now, will see. Thanks Anton
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201605230924.u4N9Oj70055801>