Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 10:51:45 -0700 From: hiren panchasara <hiren@strugglingcoder.info> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org>, FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, Konstantin Kulikov <k.kulikov2@gmail.com>, Vitalii Duk <mlevel.ars@gmail.com>, Jason Wolfe <nitroboost@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Unbalanced LACP link Message-ID: <20150319175145.GH53237@strugglingcoder.info> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=FQSAZrZWSgDDfeAP4W%2BYfVZZESgKbs63aYpcmQhDfwg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAH6gFOnpQ9LrpuWOe6w2nQ42Yz%2BhKSoy4WcBOTSEOkMMxnV8sA@mail.gmail.com> <CAD%2BeXGRB4BD7xRL14KkLo-7uMWWEwZx97Y01g4dywR3-KGmTuA@mail.gmail.com> <CAH6gFOkksMYMt8bKh6=eytb9KcbM=1CEpsztFqR%2BSZ5PvXcahw@mail.gmail.com> <5506A5BB.5060204@selasky.org> <CAAAm0r1MRcJgQq=fA646tioqoWvXRKrXkExH56HjDNoETNi3_Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmo=FQSAZrZWSgDDfeAP4W%2BYfVZZESgKbs63aYpcmQhDfwg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ZPDwMsyfds7q4mrK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/17/15 at 12:34P, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 17 March 2015 at 11:33, Jason Wolfe <nitroboost@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:43 AM, Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org> = wrote: > >> On 03/16/15 10:37, Vitalii Duk wrote: > >>> > >>> I've changed use_flowid to 0 and it helped! But isn't it setting > >>> significant? In a description it says "Shift flowid bits to prevent > >>> multiqueue collisions". > >> > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> Maybe your ethernet hardware is not properly setting the m_flowid ... > >> > >> --HPS > >> > > > > Flip use_flowid back to 1 and try setting > > net.link.lagg.default_flowid_shift / net.link.lagg.X.flowid_shift to 0 > > as Hiren suggested. r260179 added this shift, which has caused us > > balancing issues with the i350/igb. > > > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=3Drevision&revision=3D260179 > > > > Based on Adrian's comment about igb/ixgbe not setting the 'full > > flowid' under normal conditions, does that mean this shift should be 0 > > by default to ensure we don't break balancing for devices that only > > set the CPU/MSIX queue? >=20 > Or we can just see if there's anything wrong with putting the full 32 > bit RSS flowid in received packets that have them. It'd be nice to have but for now I am proposing following to fix a known broken case because of an optimization: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2098 Cheers, Hiren --ZPDwMsyfds7q4mrK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJVCwywXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRBNEUyMEZBMUQ4Nzg4RjNGMTdFNjZGMDI4 QjkyNTBFMTU2M0VERkU1AAoJEIuSUOFWPt/lsesH/02upw4F9JtJkb4fecFb6URi miXS1cjOBVah2ayhhCUHa0KQNIRG1kc3mtbk62GmF3PsF2Ryvjd8GqbNl+Vb118d R56tdlrm9nADZcRVo36ZsLVpbiCMfmnt+BQ/tsSMVCKHI68XNXuHV/oBYsgEwL93 7PrNOqHLE3oI0HIYV5eAfi9FHK0GJma3UzNcVu3uWjid/Jcc1579qVsJewjlrRJA Pcj/NWxvXCSBqeT04NwPRNmDRax4QG59/vUoNbiR3ROn5NjvNCeo1IS3ttIxpE7e n6DASChfNzsOwD8kGs7IiRrWqLJLpkoQxzbbY/6OLvugDYovelNtMUUw6rPbiVg= =GtJT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZPDwMsyfds7q4mrK--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150319175145.GH53237>