Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 11:56:42 -0700 From: Oleksandr Tymoshenko <gonzo@bluezbox.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DTrace on FreeBSD Message-ID: <4F8F0E6A.20809@bluezbox.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmokdFPoTKKBk3cV1oERRiraJy5t-xEeWcUSroTSwiC1HMQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <566771C2-84CA-4824-AE99-38EB5DE1F786@gmail.com> <20120414160028.00001573@unknown> <6D27E8DF-67E6-4084-8B88-4CD9F9900B8F@gmail.com> <CAJ-VmokdFPoTKKBk3cV1oERRiraJy5t-xEeWcUSroTSwiC1HMQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 17/04/2012 12:11 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 17 April 2012 01:44, Sevan / Venture37<venture37@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> A part (the simple one) of >>> the code has been reviewed. Anyone interested in getting KDTRACE_HOOKS >>> enabled by default is free to do an independent review and post it here. >> >> >> Adam Leventhal on KDTRACE_HOOKS >> https://twitter.com/ahl/statuses/192027893319221248 > > Let's get Adam to write up a summary and post it here. We'll then flip > the switch. FWIW I gathered list of files opened by cc1 when building amd64 GENERIC with KDTRACE_HOOKS disabled and enabled (idea courtesy of brooks@). Here is the diff: http://people.freebsd.org/~gonzo/generic-hooks.diff Looks like no CDDL code is involved.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F8F0E6A.20809>