Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:44:06 -0500 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Lenovo T520: Present (-STABLE) vs. Future (-CURRENT) ACPI Support Message-ID: <201501201044.07013.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmomspE98%2B45nF8x6UYEhPPUOj-N2N%2B4xwJahrc7AG1spgQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <20141226165731.GA28169@workbox.Home> <20150118232836.GA1494@workbox.Home> <CAJ-VmomspE98%2B45nF8x6UYEhPPUOj-N2N%2B4xwJahrc7AG1spgQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday, January 18, 2015 11:20:21 pm Adrian Chadd wrote: > hm, someone just needs to do the MFC. I don't have stable/10 on any > laptop, so I'd be doing it blind. I think most of these types of MFCs are blind as most of the folks testing it in HEAD are running HEAD. > Would someone with stable/10 please MFC 270516 from HEAD? Pretty please? Eh, you can always use a VM to test the 10 build if you wish, but since you committed this head, you should just MFC it to 10. You've already gotten one confirmation by a user reporting that it works fine when merged, so I think that is ample. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201501201044.07013.jhb>