Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 13:40:54 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Oliver Pinter <oliver.pntr@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Intel Centrino Wireless-N 2230 status Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmo=p4E7AO_puXnprnV8Tw8oLnO%2BFLfa6VLiQYwkXG2Qg0g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmonbEW9cw5%2BNDyU5NoOLPL1D86zbyG2zwQ7x_LYWczYLVg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAPjTQNGGoM4EYQw%2BNjScQEXeQUgttuxM9PWPL0dMpn5j=z5F7Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmo=ktO2iaSe_q41F8CuO0EoA52Y-7LDKzsmfOtTFP%2Bgnvw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPjTQNFKKRKGDj_D4KQfdT8k5DECsvakc230dnw0Yoo4DS5Lxw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmonp-3Zbmdvr%2BQ67nfvUkvxvwzYdy=8fO6rEH1-b3wf0mw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPjTQNGWqX5ic9v6X_YKd03efBEEa1WJKM8nEtN9dHZn2BuPzg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPjTQNGAD9QsVzQ9tO8e=G3aFKqJ8a1JeeCT%2BxPmWDqtVQQzqw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPjTQNGwWHZebYdKpN0-X7aY87kOrRsu9eN81euB-QE5oALUdA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmonbEW9cw5%2BNDyU5NoOLPL1D86zbyG2zwQ7x_LYWczYLVg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Also, do you run this with -bgscan ? -a On 5 September 2014 12:26, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: > Hi! > > This is just an iwn panic. Did your actual -HEAD kernel panic? > > Try doing this with sysctl dev.iwn.0.debug=0xff; let's see what > happens just before the firmware loses its mind. > > Thanks! > > > -a > > > On 5 September 2014 12:22, Oliver Pinter <oliver.pntr@gmail.com> wrote: >> I got the attached iwn panic, even if running in -ht mode. In between >> I have a working connection. >> I set up now a serial console and try to enable the ht mode with debugging. >> >> On 9/3/14, Oliver Pinter <oliver.pntr@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Or not, I forgot the -ht option in rc.conf. >>> >>> G STA + G AP = ok >>> G STA + N AP = ok >>> N STA + N AP = fail >>> >>> On 9/3/14, Oliver Pinter <oliver.pntr@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> Small status update: >>>> The mode N works too, I mistyped the other AP's passwork. >>>> So both mode G and mode N working after the backports. >>>> >>>> BTW, can you MFC the same changes to 10.1? >>>> >>>> On 9/2/14, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Compile it with IWN_DEBUG, then >>>>> >>>>> sysctl dev.iwn.0.debug=0x1 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -a >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 2 September 2014 12:41, Oliver Pinter <oliver.pntr@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> I not tried freebsd-head yet, but I'm able today. In mode N seems like >>>>>> the NIC sends only one frame, and no more. >>>>>> >>>>>> With tcpdump and/or wlandebug I see only rx packets and no tx. >>>>>> >>>>>> If you add some pointer what changes must I create to easier debug, or >>>>>> what concrete information required, feel free to ping me or send the >>>>>> details. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 9/2/14, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: >>>>>>> Cool! Have you tried freebsd-head? Does it work there? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How's it failing in association state? What's it saying? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -a >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2 September 2014 12:30, Oliver Pinter <oliver.pntr@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi All! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> After I backported all of the net80211 and iwn changes from >>>>>>>> 11-CURRENT >>>>>>>> to 10-STABLE the wireless NIC in subject working on mode G. If I try >>>>>>>> to use with mode N (ht20, ht40) it failed in association state. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> All of the backports are in this github repo: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://github.com/opntr/opBSD/commits/op/stable/10-iwn-backport >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Oliver >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmo=p4E7AO_puXnprnV8Tw8oLnO%2BFLfa6VLiQYwkXG2Qg0g>