Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 13:42:20 -0500 From: "Polyack, Steve" <Steve.Polyack@intermedix.com> To: "alc@freebsd.org" <alc@freebsd.org> Cc: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>, "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: vmdaemon CPU usage and poor performance in 10.0-RELEASE Message-ID: <4D557EC7CC2A544AA7C1A3B9CBA2B3672609BBA3C4@exchange03.epbs.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJUyCcNoTJ3xqkC_Prz3N%2BApEqYy3Mi2gA%2BuDo33dczaTMONrA@mail.gmail.com> References: <4D557EC7CC2A544AA7C1A3B9CBA2B36726098846B4@exchange03.epbs.com> <20140813152522.GI9400@home.opsec.eu> <4D557EC7CC2A544AA7C1A3B9CBA2B36726098847AF@exchange03.epbs.com> <CAJUyCcNoTJ3xqkC_Prz3N%2BApEqYy3Mi2gA%2BuDo33dczaTMONrA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Excuse my poorly formatted reply at the moment, but this seems to have fixe= d our problems. I'm going to update the bug report with a note. Thanks Alan! Steve Polyack > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > stable@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Alan Cox > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 12:14 PM > To: Polyack, Steve > Cc: Kurt Jaeger; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: vmdaemon CPU usage and poor performance in 10.0-RELEASE >=20 > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Polyack, Steve < > Steve.Polyack@intermedix.com> wrote: >=20 > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Kurt Jaeger [mailto:lists@opsec.eu] > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 11:25 AM > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > We have a handful of database servers running FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE > > > > and PostgreSQL 9.3.4. The servers have 128GB or 256GB of RAM. > > > > > > Are you aware of the recent work on that topic ? > > > > > > https://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2014-04-2014- > > > 06.html#PostgreSQL-Performance-Improvements > > > > > > Maybe kib@ knows more about this ? > > > > > > > I've recently read over this and some other posts, but they all seem to > > center around poor postgres performance. In our case at least, some li= ght > > to medium usage of postgres generally makes the entire system unusable. > > > > The patches & documents linked there also all seem to be for -CURRENT, > > which we aren't running. We're not too keen on the idea of using > CURRENT > > in production, either. We're planning on testing 10-STABLE, but I was = just > > hoping to gain some insight into what the problem may be and whether > recent > > commits to vmdaemon code in the -STABLE tree may have a positive effect > on > > what we've seen. > > > > >=20 > There is a good chance that your problem is fixed by r265945. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D557EC7CC2A544AA7C1A3B9CBA2B3672609BBA3C4>