Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 7 Dec 2017 06:14:34 -0700
From:      Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org>
To:        blubee blubeeme <gurenchan@gmail.com>
Cc:        Ben Woods <woodsb02@gmail.com>, FreeBSD ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Bringing SUB-PACKAGES to ports
Message-ID:  <F059ABD3-C908-4EAA-A295-7BC8AA2E934B@adamw.org>
In-Reply-To: <CALM2mE=dBTWYu4SBPKGLBLWpMdLJWgKuZ2iY5PkZmQUMa02u7g@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAOc73CCjofO4NpMBkChywOWn-g65wJcsJ7xUGshqf2FB=vCBpA@mail.gmail.com> <CALM2mE=dBTWYu4SBPKGLBLWpMdLJWgKuZ2iY5PkZmQUMa02u7g@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 7 Dec, 2017, at 4:16, blubee blubeeme <gurenchan@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> You guys seem to be attempting to do some cool things here and I =
actually
> appreciate flavors since those tools; python, ruby, go, pearl, php, =
etc are
> too complicated to maintained without some types of "Flavors"
>=20
> Android has been dealing with issues like this for a long time and =
they
> solved it with Gradle and product flavors:
> https://developer.android.com/studio/build/build-variants.html
>=20
> Instead of reinventing the wheel or knocking your head against brick =
walls,
> take a look at the product flavors for some inspiration?
>=20
> subheading Configure Product Flavors:
> https://developer.android.com/studio/build/build-variants.html

We already have flavors.

# Adam


--=20
Adam Weinberger
adamw@adamw.org
https://www.adamw.org


>=20
>=20
>=20
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Ben Woods <woodsb02@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
>> Hi everyone,
>>=20
>> Thank you very much for flavors. It has been long awaited, and will =
be a
>> great step forward for FreeBSD.
>>=20
>> Onwards and upwards: What is the status of subpackages?
>>=20
>> Speaking to bapt at BSDTW, it sounded like flavors was going to be =
the
>> difficult change, and subpackages would then be easy.
>>=20
>> Given that we are going through the transition to flavors now, and =
the
>> ports tools are getting updated to support it, would it be a good =
idea to
>> introduce subpackages now also? That way people who are getting =
familiar
>> with the changes required to the ports tools can use their new =
familiarity
>> whilst it is fresh to support both.
>>=20
>> For those that aren=E2=80=99t familiar:
>> - Flavors: build a port multiple times with different =
options/dependencies
>> to create multiple packages
>> - Subpackages: build a port once and chop the resulting files into =
multiple
>> subpackages
>>=20
>> https://wiki.freebsd.org/Ports/FlavorsAndSubPackages
>>=20
>> Regards,
>> Ben
>> --
>>=20
>> --
>> From: Benjamin Woods
>> woodsb02@gmail.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to =
"freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>>=20
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to =
"freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F059ABD3-C908-4EAA-A295-7BC8AA2E934B>