Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 06:18:18 +0200 From: Sulev-Madis Silber <freebsd-current-freebsd-org111@ketas.si.pri.ee> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: fixing PR#282995 Message-ID: <C7E994CE-91EC-4FD2-B9A4-C8F46AD77FA6@ketas.si.pri.ee> In-Reply-To: <CAM5tNy5YzxPZSV1JKuro4awBwaB9hrb5UCADAGKC4Q4sukgHdQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAM5tNy4YHAPUgZddok1U3Oz3vFB26-FC5M6Ocwx7bZhWm%2BUX4Q@mail.gmail.com> <F949CCDA-D424-4F83-9A0A-EE8ED7C54A10@gid.co.uk> <CAM5tNy6t_nb4pPTr1N=0%2B7jh6PHDuRz2V%2BJm575TCFpZhjje0A@mail.gmail.com> <4FEA762C-5E0F-4D3F-82D9-DF93CF1BC1F5@gid.co.uk> <CAM5tNy5YzxPZSV1JKuro4awBwaB9hrb5UCADAGKC4Q4sukgHdQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
sorry to jump in like this but is this the reason the nfs exports file has been confusing the hell ou= t of me since fbsd 4=2E6? i have had no previous experience with nfs before= , nor have i used it on other oses, ever actually whole nfs was like oh god whyyy=2E felt like yeah i'm sure this m= ade sense to some guys who have been long dead since then and i'm battling = with this now, reading this about how exports should work and history of behaviour, = it makes perfect sense why it was as if black magic an manpages didn't hell= in any way either=2E it felt like i'm constantly making some grave securit= y mistakes there=2E it should never be the only method for limiting the acc= ess but nevertheless wtfs per minute has been very high there and i rather = not even touch it so after i read on reason, it partially makes sense to me=2E i wonder if i= t could be fixed somehow? or should just be left like this? or should be le= ft to confuse newcomers until big crunch takes universe away?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C7E994CE-91EC-4FD2-B9A4-C8F46AD77FA6>